About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Briefs

AMC, Robinhood Dispute Highlights Equity Token Market Debate

Subscribe to our newsletter

The CEOs of AMC Entertainment and Robinhood are publicly clashing over tokenised stocks” trading on Robinhood’s blockchain. The conflict got its start when AMC CEO Adam Aron discovered that Robinhood was offering a digital token bearing the movie theatre chain’s name and tracking its stock price – all l without AMC’s permission or involvement.

Robinhood launched a product featuring third-party tokenised real-world assets, which includes synthetic tokens representing AMC and over 190 other companies. These tokens are designed to mirror the price movements of actual stocks on a blockchain, allowing traders to speculate on equity prices.

However, because these tokens are generated by a third party rather than sponsored by the actual companies, Robinhood does not need AMC’s permission to issue its tokens and buyers do not own actual shares of AMC.

AMC CEO Adam Aron used social media to cry foul, calling the practice “contemptible, outrageous, disgusting, detestable, inexcusable, and vile.” His primary arguments against Robinhood’s approach include: (1) it confuses investors; (2) token holders do not possess any voting rights in AMC; and (3) AMC’s ability to raise capital might be impacted.

Aron also issued a cease-and-desist demand and threatened to take the matter directly to the SEC.

 Robinhood has refused to back down. Robinhood’s Chief Legal Officer, Dan Gallagher (a former SEC commissioner), publicly dismissed AMC’s outrage, stating that the firm is fully aware of US. securities laws and effectively dared AMC to send the lawyers.”


Whatever the details of this particular confrontation, the clash highlights a significant debate in the markets related tokenised equities and whether the best way forward is issuer-sponsored tokens or third-party tokens.

Like a bad horror-movie series, this one could run and run and might well lead to copycat actions. The SEC of late has tended to want to give the tokenisation space some tolerance to work out its own rules. But if enough negative noise erupts around third-party tokens, it may need to step in.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: From Monolith to Modular: Architecting Equity Trading Platforms for 24/5 and Beyond

Date: 14 October 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Equities markets are entering a more distributed, always-on phase. Liquidity is fragmenting across venues and geographies, trading hours are extending toward 24/5 and beyond, and market data volumes, investor expectations and competitive pressure are all rising at once. Many...

BLOG

We’ve Been Asking the Wrong Question About Tokenisation

By Julie Ros, SVP, Head of Marketing, Communications & Institutional Growth, tZERO For the past several years, the tokenisation industry has been asking the same question: What assets can we tokenise next? Treasuries. Money market funds. Private credit. Real estate. Equities. Commodities. Intellectual property. Nearly every week brings another announcement celebrating another asset moving on...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2019/2020 – Seventh Edition

Welcome to A-Team Group’s best read handbook, the Regulatory Data Handbook, which is now in its seventh edition and continues to grow in terms of the number of regulations covered, the detail of each regulation and the impact that all the rules and regulations will have on data and data management at your institution. This...