About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Reuters Enterprise Data Likely to Be Reference Data Force Post-Merger

Subscribe to our newsletter

Thomson Corp.’s agreed acquisition of Reuters, which remains subject to regulatory approvals, would essentially ‘reverse’ Reuters into Thomson Financial, creating a financial information business larger than current market leader Bloomberg (Market Data Insight, May 2007). Following the proposed merger – which envisages Reuters CEO Tom Glocer taking the helm of the overall Thomson-Reuters corporation and his sidekick Devin Wenig running the financial information business – it’s likely that Reuters’ enterprise data business would emerge as the dominant force in the combined company’s reference data activities.

Reuters has by far the larger of the two companies’ reference data operations. Indeed, Thomson Financial’s main activities in this area focus more on fundamental and descriptive databases than on the kind of securities and entity administration data normally considered as reference data in the strict sense. In reference data, as in much else, Reuters will dominate the merged Thomson Financial/Reuters operating unit – to be known as, erm, Reuters.

That said, Reuters’ enterprise data business is currently leaderless, following the departure of Kevin Bradshaw (Reference Data Review, April 2007). Several senior Enterprise group executives are currently vying to take on Bradshaw’s role, which reports into Enterprise group head Peter Moss. Thomson Financial, though, has something of a secret weapon in terms of reference data expertise, in the form of Thomas Aubrey, who has spearheaded the company’s push into the investment management segment in Europe. Aubrey, who joined Thomson from Interactive Data a few years ago, would be a valuable addition to the reference data brainpower of the combined entity.
Thomson also has recently entered the bond evaluations business, albeit through a tie-in with Standard & Poor’s (Reference Data Review, June 2006). Reuters has its own bond evaluations offering, and it’s questionable whether Reuters executives would have an appetite for continuing with an initiative that involved third-party-sourced information.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

Agentic AI Deployment Presents Potentially Dangerous Data ‘Trust Paradox’

Artificial intelligence deployment in capital markets’ data processes may be approaching an inflection point that, if not managed properly, could introduce dangerous risks to institutions’ operations. The growing deployment of anonymous agents has the potential to hardwire data errors into workflows, magnifying data weaknesses as the automating technology scales processes, according Informatica from Salesforce. The...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

Impact of Derivatives on Reference Data Management

They may be complex and burdened with a bad reputation at the moment, but derivatives are here to stay. Although Bank for International Settlements figures indicate that derivatives trading is down for the first time in 10 years, the asset class has been strongly defended by the banking and brokerage community over the last few...