About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Opinion: Why the Client On-Boarding Conundrum Will Fuel Master Data Management (MDM) in Capital Markets

Subscribe to our newsletter

Neill Vanlint, Managing Director of EMEA and Asia for GoldenSource, explains how MDM can provide answers to the client on-boarding challenge facing financial institutions.

Taking one step forward and two steps back – that’s what it must feel like for financial institutions at the moment. You could be forgiven for thinking that finding a solution to manage all reference, counterparty, client and customer data in one place ticks all the compliance boxes. But regulators show no sign of taking their foot off the accelerator. When a new client signs up, institutions immediately have to define exactly what product they are selling and to whom.

This is no easy task and as more counterparties and clients sign up, the challenge facing banks is around keeping track of who’s who and what’s what. These days, it is simply too risky not to verify each stage of the client on-boarding process.

Take the initial handling of a new customer, or on-boarding as it’s better known. This involves those all-important KYC checks for sanctions and conflicts of interest. All well and good, but what if the institution in question is doing business with a firm in Luxembourg, whose parent company is based in Libya, for example? This is all about understanding how an organisation’s corporate hierarchy operates – vital in light of controversies around offshore havens. An institution then needs to look at what products have been authorised to trade. The scenario could arise where someone only trades Fixed Income derivatives, for example. Or it may well be that an institution only authorises select people to trade a certain product or volume of currencies or bonds. As if that wasn’t enough, there is the small matter of deciding which clearing house to use and who to settle trades with. Relying on manual intervention only to manage these events will trigger errors and attract the gaze of the regulator.

What’s needed is a workflow that fits around the entity master to validate each stage and also the ability to map products to customers and counterparties. This is what the corporate world calls master data management (MDM) – which fully automates and strings together these critical processes and establishes relationships. By definition, MDM involves the processes, governance, architecture and standards required to source, cleanse and centralise data to provide a single view of the business – including new customers. However, capital markets has unique relationships, such as that of counterparty. This challenges the corporate world’s approach to MDM and it’s these idiosyncrasies that require a different solution for capital markets – one which needs to be future proofed for flexibility.

No financial institution in its right mind wants to keep re-tooling their existing solution as soon as a new regulation comes into play or, more importantly, as new KYC services become available. Flexibility to on-board new KYC services or utilities is also important and having a system that can fully leverage these capabilities to handle the regulatory obligations of the future has never been more important. By integrating the on-boarding process with MDM-style data management, firms can conduct efficient compliance refreshes based on customer data changing over time and reap huge business benefits. With this in place, financial institutions can confidently take a step forward and look for upsell and cross-sell opportunities, instead of taking another step back to evaluate a new customer’s compliance credentials.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Non-Financial Misconduct Under SMCR

Non-financial misconduct – encompassing behaviours such as bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination is a key focus of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has underscored that such misconduct is not only unethical but also poses significant risks to a firm’s culture and operational integrity. Recognizing the profound impact on...

BLOG

Regulator-First AI: Vivox Brings Atomic Workflows to Compliance Operations

Artificial intelligence has become a default talking point in financial crime compliance. Yet for many regulated firms, particularly those operating across capital markets, payments, and treasury functions, the challenge is no longer whether AI can be used, but whether it can be deployed in a way regulators will accept. For Vivox AI, a young company...

EVENT

TEST Event page 1

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Valuations – Toward On-Demand Evaluated Pricing

Risk and regulatory imperatives are demanding access to the latest portfolio information, placing new pressures on the pricing and valuation function. And the front office increasingly wants up-to-date valuations of hard-to-price securities. These developments are driving a push toward on-demand evaluated pricing capabilities, with pricing teams seeking to provide access to valuations at higher frequency...