About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

How to Manage Dual Sanctions Compliance Post Brexit Addition of UK Regime to EU Regulation

Subscribe to our newsletter

Brexit created a number of regulatory compliance challenges for financial institutions in the UK, not least a change to sanctions regulation that is set out in the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018, and is fundamentally different to EU sanctions regulation. If your organisation falls within scope of the new UK sanctions regime or both the UK and EU regimes, how can you ensure compliance and avoid punitive fines for breaching sanctions?

This question and many more will be answered in A-Team Group’s 11 March 2021 webinar,  The post-Brexit UK sanctions regime – how to stay safe and compliant. Haider Mannan, regulatory specialist at SIX, and a participant in the webinar, notes the need to reengineer systems and processes to ensure UK sanctions information published by the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI)) is ingested, monitored and acted on as necessary by investment firms.

He says: “We now have a dual sanctions process, with two decision points based on two regulatory frameworks with divergent data points. It is a firm’s responsibility to ensure that wherever it is doing business it complies with relevant regulation. In many cases, firms will be affected by both the UK and EU regulations.”

Firms in the EU doing business in the UK will be subject to the UK sanctions regime, while firms in the UK doing business in the EU will be subject to both regimes. Adding to the complexity, firms must carry out ongoing due diligence on all new and existing instruments, whether traded directly or indirectly, to ensure they know who is materially in control of the instruments. “These linkages are very important to deciding whether an instrument is prohibited from trading,” comments Mannan.

With so much at stake, firms need to move on from manual processes used to identify sanctioned securities – which can lead to erroneous decisions, trading sanctioned securities and criminal penalties – to automated services that provide a watertight process of identification. With automated sanctions solutions in place, firms can gain business benefits beyond compliance.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: GenAI and LLM case studies for Surveillance, Screening and Scanning

As Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) move from pilot to production, compliance, surveillance, and screening functions are seeing tangible results – and new risks. From trade surveillance to adverse media screening to policy and regulatory scanning, GenAI and LLMs promise to tackle complexity and volume at a scale never seen before. But...

BLOG

NetApp Q&A: Intelligent Storage Helps Overcome Silo Challenges

NetApp is a cloud-native data storage and AI solutions provider that is based in San Jose, California. Data Management Insight spoke to chief marketing officer Gabie Boko to learn more about how the company helps financial institutions. Data Management Insight: When was NetApp formed, and how do you service financial institutions and financial services companies?...

EVENT

RepRisk Sustainability Breakfast Roundtable London

The London sustainability breakfast is part of the global roundtable thought leadership event series hosted by RepRisk in key markets, including, New York, Toronto, London, Frankfurt, Oslo, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Hong Kong and Singapore in 2026.

GUIDE

Risk & Compliance

The current financial climate has meant that risk management and compliance requirements are never far from the minds of the boards of financial institutions. In order to meet the slew of regulations on the horizon, firms are being compelled to invest in their systems in order to cope with the new requirements. Data management is...