About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

FCA Publishes Final Rules on SM&CR

Subscribe to our newsletter

The UK financial services regulator has published the final rules regarding the extension of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR) to FCA solo-regulated firms. The changes are due to come into force on December 9, 2019 – the same deadline by which brokers have to comply with the new regulation (which was adopted by banks in 2016 and insurance firms in 2018).

The changes include the exclusion of the Head of Legal function from the requirement to be approved as a Senior Manager, a clarification of the requirements and scope of the certification regime, and an extension of the Senior Manager Conduct Rule 4 (SC4) to non-approved Executive Directors at Limited Scope firms.

The extension follows a consultation by the FCA launched in January 2019, for which it reportedly received just 29 responses.

The regulator has previously urged brokers to ensure they are ready for the new regime, which will substantially increase personal accountability among the directors of affected firms, of which there are an estimated 47,000 in the UK.

“’The one key piece [of advice] which I would absolutely leave with somebody else who is adopting it is – this has got to be owned and led by the business, so you cannot delegate it to HR or compliance or any other kind of function,” warned Vis Raghavan, Chief Executive Officer of EMEA, J.P. Morgan earlier this year.

The complexity of the regulation is such that firms are being forced to turn towards technology – meaning that a multitude of new solutions are now emerging to assist with the new requirements.

“For firms of a certain size, the complexity and scale of managing SM&CR means technology is the only workable solution. The risk to the firm, and individually to senior managers, of personal fines and sanctions, is too significant to rely on manual solutions,” says Redland Solutions, a regtech software firm.

“The cost and pace of regulatory change is cited by many Chief Risk Officers and Chief Compliance Officers as one of the biggest and highest priority risks in the industry and there are no signs of it reducing. The degree of regulatory change, if anything is set to increase.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Non-Financial Misconduct Under SMCR

Non-financial misconduct – encompassing behaviours such as bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination is a key focus of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has underscored that such misconduct is not only unethical but also poses significant risks to a firm’s culture and operational integrity. Recognizing the profound impact on...

BLOG

How Firms Are Adapting to a Multi-Channel, AI-Driven Future – Global Relay Survey

Global Relay has published its 2025/26 Data Insights: Communications Capture Trends report, now in its third annual edition and rapidly becoming a reference point for how regulated financial institutions manage their communications obligations. Drawing on data from more than 12,000 regulated financial institutions using Global Relay’s connectors, the survey tracks which channels firms are archiving,...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management, 2009 Edition

This year has truly been a year of change for the data management community. Regulators and industry participants alike have been keenly focused on the importance of data with regards to compliance and risk management considerations. The UK Financial Services Authority’s fining of Barclays for transaction reporting failures as a result of inconsistent underlying reference...