About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Expert Advice on Integrating Entity Data Hierarchies, Sanctions and KYC Processes

Subscribe to our newsletter

Integrating entity data hierarchies with sanctions and Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements can be problematic, but getting it right can deliver significant business and operational benefits.

The challenges and opportunities of managing entity data hierarchies and keeping track of sanctions, watch lists and politically exposed persons (PEPs) across KYC processes were discussed during a recent A-Team Group webinar. The challenges identified included sourcing validated entity and hierarchy data, managing integration in a timely way, working with siloed KYC processes and keeping up with changes to sanctions. The opportunities were business and operational benefits.

The webinar was moderated by A-Team editor Sarah Underwood and joined by Clare Rowley, head of business operations at the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF); Alan Samuels, business manager of entity intelligence at Bloomberg; and Kelvin Dickenson, vice president of compliance solutions at Alacra.

The speakers started with a description of entity data ownership hierarchies, noting that previous requirements to identify entities with 51% or more ownership of other entities are in some regulatory cases being reduced to 25% ownership or control of another entity. Rowley reviewed the hierarchy data provided by the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) system, including Level 1 data covering who is who and who owns whom, and soon Level 2 data covering who owns what.

Moving on to the challenge of sourcing, validating and managing entity hierarchy data, an audience poll showed 48% of respondents saying their organisation needs to improve how this is done, 21% saying they do it very well, 17% saying they have yet to address the task, and 14% saying they do it quite well.

The webinar speakers agreed that sourcing and validating hierarchy data is difficult, but important. Samuels said the process can be complex, challenging and expensive, and suggested best practice approaches to ease the burden including codifying business rules and using automation and machine learning tools to support the process and trigger alerts when additional research is required to make an entity ownership hierarchy as complete as possible.

Looking at why entity hierarchy data, sanctions and KYC must be integrated, Dickenson explained that all these elements must be linked to gain a true understanding of a company’s customers. Best practice approaches include building a scalable system to request, receive and manage entity data as part of the integration, and taking a holistic approach to entity data and risk management that includes data associated with entities and delivers a timely and ongoing process with a full audit trail.

Final advice for data management practitioners working in the entity data, sanctions and KYC space included extracting every ounce of value out of entity data that is collected; making processes flexible and future proof; and evaluating the benefits of the LEI for your organisation.

Listen to the webinar to find out about:

  • Sourcing entity and hierarchy data
  • Integrating entity data, sanctions and KYC
  • Solving data management challenges
  • Technology and automation solutions
  • Business and operational benefits
Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

FinCEN Overhauls AML and CFT Rules with a New Effectiveness Standard

Published April 7, 2026, FinCEN’s latest Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is a sweeping overhaul of anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) programmes, recasting them around effectiveness, risk-based design and the fight against illicit finance. “For too long, Washington has asked financial institutions to measure success by the volume of paperwork...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

Enterprise Data Management, 2010 Edition

The global regulatory community has become increasingly aware of the data management challenge within financial institutions, as it struggles with its own challenge of better tracking systemic risk across financial markets. The US regulator in particular is seemingly keen to kick off a standardisation process and also wants the regulatory community to begin collecting additional...