About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

EBA Seeks to Reduce Reporting Costs for Financial Firms

Subscribe to our newsletter

The European Banking Authority (EBA) is exploring ways to streamline supervisory reporting requirements and reduce reporting costs for financial institutions, especially smaller ones, as part of its drive to create a more “proportionate” regulatory and supervisory framework.

Common supervisory reporting was first introduced in the EU back in 2013, and the EBA is mandated by Article 430(8) of the EU’s Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) to measure the costs institutions incur when complying with the reporting requirements set out in its Implementing Technical Standards (ITS) on supervisory reporting. The bank is also required to assess whether these reporting costs are proportionate with regard to the benefits delivered for the purposes of prudential supervision and make recommendations on how to reduce the reporting cost at least for small and non-complex institutions.

To this end, the EBA this week has launched a new survey addressed to all European banks, calling for case studies to collect evidence on reporting costs as well as industry views on ways to reduce such costs and make the supervisory reporting more efficient.

The findings from this analysis should be formulated in a report and delivered to the European Commission and European Parliament in 2021. The cost of compliance study will focuses first, on understanding the actual reporting costs incurred by institutions in relation to supervisory reporting, and in particular in relation to the EBA ITS; second, on assessing the effects of a reduction of some specific reporting requirements on costs and supervisory effectiveness; and third, on assessing whether the reporting costs are proportionate with regard to the benefits delivered.

The deadline for questionnaire responses and case study submission is October 2020 – with responses to the qualitative questions expected by 1 October 2020, and responses to the quantitative questions as well as the submission of case studies are expected by 31 October 2020.

The final report, expected to be delivered to the European Commission and European Parliament in 2021, will contain recommendations on how to reduce reporting costs for the banking industry by looking at both technological improvements and reducing some reporting requirements.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

Basel III / FRTB: One Framework, Multiple Timelines, Mounting Pain for Global Firms

For much of the past decade, Basel III has been discussed as a global regulatory reform programme moving at uneven speed, but broadly in the same direction. The UK Prudential Regulation Authority’s confirmation of its Basel 3.1 timetable brings welcome clarity for firms operating in the UK market, yet it also underlines a deeper reality:...

EVENT

ExchangeTech Summit London

A-Team Group, organisers of the TradingTech Summits, are pleased to announce the inaugural ExchangeTech Summit London on May 14th 2026. This dedicated forum brings together operators of exchanges, alternative execution venues and digital asset platforms with the ecosystem of vendors driving the future of matching engines, surveillance and market access.

GUIDE

The Global LEI System – Slow but Sure

After what looked like a slow start to the summer, the initiative to establish a global standard for legal entity identifiers (LEIs) took a series of significant leaps forward during August, that appears to have put the project firmly back on track. If the marketplace felt a little reticent in June and July, it could...