About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Can You Prove Risk-Based e-Comms Surveillance Outcomes Have Merit?

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Robert Houghton, Founder, CTO and Technical Evangelist at Insightful Technology.

The elephant in the room whenever a discussion turns to risk-based surveillance is the fact that many Compliance Officers do not have complete confidence in their data. There are currently no parameters from the regulators of the financial sector to permit risk-based surveillance, yet still the approach is carrying favour with many Compliance Officers.

If this is a course you are considering for your organisation, ask yourself this one question: Should the regulator comes knocking, how will you demonstrate that the outcomes of your risk-based assessments have merit?

The risk-based approach has gathered momentum. However, can pure analysis of e-comms provide a data model that is sufficient to conduct an effective risk-based methodology? Whilst a risk-based approach to measuring a decision process has merit, have organisations considered extending the model to include other data sources?

This leads us on to the misleading narrative that has emerged surrounding the viability of holistic surveillance. Whether financial institutions have successfully built the right models to do holistic surveillance is a different matter! However, debating the different approaches to eComms surveillance distracts from the underlying issue that truly needs to be addressed, and that is how to solve the data quality problem. Get this right and whatever model for surveillance you then choose to implement in the future will be based on a sound and reliable footing.

Like it or not, it needs to begin by addressing who is actually responsible for the delivered surveillance functions. IT are responsible for delivering the infrastructure and supporting the chosen solution and compliance are looking for a solution that meets their needs. Neither party are proven data scientists, who can fully analyse and understand the data and data flows, the links between disparate sources of data and create a single clean data set. I believe that this forms the single biggest hurdle for the market to achieve cost effective automated compliance through machine learning, AI and risk-based surveillance models.

I am not opposed to risk-based eComms surveillance, or indeed any approach a financial institution deems right for their circumstances. Applying a risk profile to the surveillance objects, as a ranking tool, can make good sense. However, it would be remiss for me as a vendor that is well entrenched within financial institutions around the world, to not issue a note of caution as this trend gathers momentum.

Should banks come to the decision that a risk-based approach is right for them, it is our responsibility as a technology vendor, to work together with them and other consultancies to navigate a path that keeps them on the right side of the regulator. Openness with the regulator is essential and it is imperative that they are kept well informed regarding the guidelines, processes and reporting that will be implemented.

Tackling the seemingly larger data challenge may seem insurmountable, but the rewards to be reaped are immense and not only in relation to removing compliance and regulatory related headaches. Regulatory compliance is to a large extent about honesty and transparency, whether within an organisation or with the regulators. As such there is a need for some introspection to look at the root cause of the problem that faces compliance teams every day. In doing so, we transform the function and perception of the compliance department, from a cost centre to a value-driven asset, not only safeguarding the organisation, but delivering additional insight-driven value throughout it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content


Upcoming Webinar: New solutions to the old problems of compliance with communications surveillance regulation

Date: 6 December 2022 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Communications surveillance is an integral element of trading at financial institutions, and its functions are clearly set out in jurisdictional regulations – to capture, record and retain all communications. Essentially, all business related communications must be recorded whatever the...


Compliance.ai Plans Market Growth and Expansion on Back of $6 Million Funding Round

Compliance.ai, a provider of regulatory change management solutions, has secured $6 million of funding, which it will use to promote market growth and expansion. At the same time, the company has brought in a new CEO, Asif Alam, who will replace Kayvan Alikhani, who will continue innovating Compliance.ai products as co-founder and chief product/strategy officer....


Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 12th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in New York brings together the North American, capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore the evolution of data strategy and how to leverage data to drive compliance and business insight.


ESG Data Handbook 2022

The ESG landscape is changing faster than anyone could have imagined even five years ago. With tens of trillions of dollars expected to have been committed to sustainable assets by the end of the decade, it’s never been more important for financial institutions of all sizes to stay abreast of changes in the ESG data...