About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Authologic Registration Brings EUDI Wallets Closer to Institutional KYC

Subscribe to our newsletter

Authologic has become the first Polish company registered to issue Electronic Attestations of Attributes (EAAs) for European Union Digital Identity Wallets. Its registration provides an early example of how the European framework could affect financial-sector identity checks.

The registration, granted by Narodowy Bank Polski, allows Authologic to issue and verify EAAs. These cryptographically signed credentials enable people and organisations to share verified information through an EU Digital Identity Wallet.

The capability is available now and can be tested through Authologic’s European Union Digital Identity (EUDI) Playground. The company is also participating in financial-institution onboarding pilots and the EU-funded WE BUILD consortium.

Moving Beyond Document-Based Identity Checks

EU Member States must make at least one EUDI Wallet available from December 2026 under the revised Electronic Identification, Authentication and Trust Services Regulation, known as eIDAS 2.0.

The wallet will allow its holder to store and present identity information and other credentials electronically. A bank or investment firm receiving a credential can check its issuer, integrity and validity without asking the client to upload another copy of the underlying document. Possible applications include bank authentication credentials, employee badges, payment credentials and proof of professional status.

Applying Wallet Credentials to Institutional KYC

Institutional KYC checks involve a legal entity and the people connected with it. Firms may need to identify directors, beneficial owners, trustees, authorised traders, account administrators and signatories.

Authologic said its credentials could verify directorship, beneficial ownership, professional status and an individual’s authority to act for a legal entity. A client representative could therefore present identity data alongside evidence of their role and signing authority.

This could reduce repeated requests for personal and corporate documents during onboarding and periodic reviews. Firms would still need to decide which issuers they trust and whether the credential provides enough information for the control being performed.

Currency presents another issue. Directors leave, mandates change and powers of attorney are withdrawn. Firms will need to check whether a credential remains valid and how quickly a change at the original source leads to revocation or replacement.

Authologic tells RegTech Insight it is currently conducting pilot projects related to the onboarding process for financial institutions”, including banks. It has not named the institutions involved. Its EUDI Playground also demonstrates identity verification, Strong Customer Authentication, payment approval, account mandates and digital signing.

Private Banking and Corporate Treasury

Private banking may provide an early application because onboarding starts with individual identity but often extends into trusts, family structures and corporate vehicles. Wallet credentials could help verify high-net-worth clients, trustees, attorneys and authorised advisers across several banking relationships.

Corporate treasury presents related uses. Credentials could identify employees accessing banking systems, confirm their authority under an account mandate and support payment approvals. They could also provide an auditable record of who authorised an instruction and under which authority.

Identity Verification Is Only Part of KYC

Wallet credentials don’t replace the risk-based part of the process. Financial institutions must still assess the customer, understand the purpose of the relationship and conduct ongoing monitoring. Sanctions and politically exposed person screening remain separate controls. Source-of-funds and source-of-wealth enquiries will also continue where required.

Authologic’s pilots would demonstrate how reusable credentials address a longstanding source of friction in institutional KYC. Clients are frequently asked to supply the same information in different formats as compliance, operations and business teams conduct their own checks.

At scale, wallet-based credentials could allow verified identity, ownership and authority data to be supplied once and shared with permitted teams throughout the review. That could shorten onboarding and periodic reviews, reduce repeated client requests and improve the relationship from the outset, while leaving risk assessment and approval with the institution.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Generative and Agentic AI in Financial Markets: What the Data Really Shows

Date: 15 October 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial markets – but the reality on the ground is more nuanced, more uneven, and more instructive than the headlines suggest. A new A-Team Insight research programme, drawing on responses from senior AI decision-makers at...

BLOG

ESMA’s Data Quality Report Signals a Higher Bar for Regulatory Reporting Data

By Michele Hillery, Managing Director, Head of Repository & Derivatives Services at The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC). Regulators across jurisdictions are leveraging trade reporting data as a supervisory resource, using it to monitor risk, assess market activity and inform policy and oversight decisions. As this use becomes more sophisticated, firms face an even...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...