About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Blockchain Could Shorten Settlement Time, Paxos Exec Says

Subscribe to our newsletter

Another frontier for application of blockchain distributed ledger technology could be shortening the settlement cycle for trades, says an executive at Paxos, the blockchain technology company that completed a pilot program with Euroclear in December for gold transaction settlement.

Paxos is planning to roll out its gold transaction settlement capabilities more widely in 2017, building on its Euroclear Bankchain effort, according to Rajesh Nair, vice president of engineering at Paxos. More broadly, blockchain can disrupt middle and back office functions, not just front-office and trading functions, adds Nair.

“T+3 [trade date plus three] settlement means you’re locking up all the capital for three days,” he says. “When you do instantaneous settlement, you unlock all that capital. … The fact that we still need three days to settle a trade is just not sustainable as a processing constant. We’re striving for near real-time settlement. If we’re highly successful at what we’re trying to do, then as a first a trade and the settlement will be the same day. The endgame is to say the trade and settlement are the same thing.”

By creating a delivery-versus-payment transaction and record that is agreed upon by both parties to a transaction, reconciliations become unnecessary, explains Nair. “Blockchain enables you to skip reconciliations, because you have a copy of that same database that everybody has,” he says. “So there are no reconciliation costs. Blockchain itself reconciles everything. That has the potential to reduce a whole slew of costs from the back office.”

Paxos’ Bankchain service is built to be interoperable through APIs or FIX and Swift connections. Paxos has a market advisory group in which users (including some Tier 1 firms) provide feedback on its services. “They can advise us what’s wrong with it and see how it integrates with existing systems,” says Nair. “We use the feedback to refine the product.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: GenAI and LLM case studies for Surveillance, Screening and Scanning

As Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) move from pilot to production, compliance, surveillance, and screening functions are seeing tangible results – and new risks. From trade surveillance to adverse media screening to policy and regulatory scanning, GenAI and LLMs promise to tackle complexity and volume at a scale never seen before. But...

BLOG

SEC’s 2026 Examination Priorities – 10 Notable Changes

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has released its Examination Priorities for 2026, and while many supervisory themes continue from 2025, the tone and structure of the new document reflect a decisive pivot. After years of rapid organisational expansion and broadening remit, the Division of Examinations is now emphasising consistency, prioritisation and the effective...

EVENT

RegTech Summit London

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in London will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the European capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

MiFID II handbook, third edition – How compliant are you?

Six months after Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) went live, how compliant is your organisation? If you took a tactical approach to cross the compliance line on January 3, 2018, how are you reviewing and renewing systems to take a more strategic approach and what are the business benefits of doing so?...