About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Reval Poll Shows Most End-User Costs Would Increase to Comply with Dodd-Frank

Subscribe to our newsletter

In a live webinar poll last week hosted by Reval, the premiere Software-as-a-Service provider for financial risk management, 68 percent of non-financial end-users of derivatives said that they do not have a Credit Support Annex (CSA) in place with counterparties to their OTC derivative contracts, indicating potential cost impacts for key compliance requirements expected under the Dodd-Frank Act. CSA’s are legal documents amending each ISDA Swap Master Agreements (ISDA’s).

In addition, despite the potential headaches and costs associated with the requirement for all market participants to have CSA’s to handle margin requirements, 92 percent of non-financial end-users of derivatives polled say they do not expect to decrease their use of the instruments post final rules.

“This validates the importance of OTC derivatives for commercial hedgers of risk as despite the increases in costs coming their way, the need is still there,” says Jiro Okochi, CEO & Co-Founder of Reval, who hosted “Rules, Rules, Rules: Impacts from Derivative Regulation Under Dodd-Frank .” Reval Chief Compliance Officer Patrick Trozzo co-hosted the webinar, which drew over 450 registrants.

“Our webinar was attended by many Fortune 500 companies, so I suspect as you go further downstream in the market, the actual number of companies not having CSA’s would be above 85 percent,” says Okochi. “Most companies will have to negotiate at least 10 ISDA agreements and monitor thresholds and collateral to each of their Swap Dealers. This number could also go up for commodities hedgers as they most likely would have to negotiate new ISDA’s with pushed-out commodities market-making desks from banks.”

Reval’s poll indicated that 41 percent of registrants do not even have ISDA’s in place. “Even for those that have CSA’s and ISDA’s in place with Swap Dealers, all ISDAs would have to be re-negotiated,” Okochi says.

Under the current draft business conduct and margin rules proposed by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the regulatory agency working to implement Dodd-Frank, non-financial end-users would be required to obtain a CSA to describe how their company’s swap transactions would be covered under collateral or margin agreements. In addition to the legal costs of amending each ISDA Master Agreement, companies would “have to have the people, processes and systems in place to monitor these CSA agreements,” says Okochi.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Building a Semantic Layer for Your Enterprise Data Estate

The democratisation of data has encouraged engineers to think about how to make their data estates more accessible and useable for non-technical business end-users. Translating intention into data action requires careful configuration that enables consumers to mine insight, analytics and value without having to use precise technical terminology. Data engineers achieve this through semantic layers,...

BLOG

Data Quality Meaning and Importance Transformed by AI: DMS NYC Preview

The data management space has been transformed by artificial intelligence into one that not only seeks to prise maximum value from institutions’ data but also spends almost as much resource ensuring the quality of that information. Without optimised data, the AI and agentic tools to which it is deployed will churn out sub-optimal results. It’s...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Summit in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...