About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Quantifi Stresses Data Management Requirement for Basel III Credit Risk

Subscribe to our newsletter

Quantifi has built out its counterparty credit risk platform to meet the capital requirements of Basel III. But the company warns that data aggregation and management coupled to a centralised approach to the regulation are essential to full compliance and managing the cost of capital.

Basel III regulation was finalised in June 2011 and will be implemented into law in the European Union by the Capital Requirements Directive IV. Despite a postponement in bringing the regulation into force from January 2013 to January 2019, Quantifi says banks subject to the regulation should be looking now at how they will achieve compliance.

Dmitry Pugachevsky, director of research at Quantifi, says that whether they are building or buying Basel III solutions, banks should be bringing together all the data needed to calculate counterparty credit risk capital charges, including credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk capital charges, centrally to achieve the best capital results. He also encourages use of the same data and models for both regulatory and trading systems to ensure consistency and ease compliance.

The company works predominantly with tier two banks and has been using used its counterparty credit risk engine to run CVA capital charges calculations across retail, commercial and investment bank portfolios. The aim is to identify which calculation methods, perhaps the internal model method or advanced method, deliver the best outcomes in terms of lower capital charges.

The work suggests the best performing methods are the internal model method for Basel II risk weighted assets and the advanced method for Basel III CVA risk capital charges. Quantifi states: “This result confirms that implementing sophisticated Monte Carlo models and getting regulatory approvals can save significant amounts of capital.” The company also refutes market opinion suggesting that Basel II counterparty credit risk capital charges are much lower than those required by Basel III, noting that charges can be similar depending on the methods used in calculation.

Quantifi’s Basel III solution uses the same software as its Basel II offering, albeit with slightly different data, managing both credit and market risk on the platform and taking into account issues such as collateral management and cross-product netting agreements. Calculations are made in real time and an integrated reporting system allows users to drill down into the data to discover the effects of particular counterparties or trades on capital charges.

Pugachevsky acknowledges market competitors such as Murex and Calypso, but suggests Quantifi provides an enterprise risk system with a more user friendly front-office element that not only delivers real-time data, but also a relatively easy to use solution for sensitivities and scenario creation. However, even with a risk system in place, he repeats that the opportunity to reduce capital requirements remains a function of the collection of high quality, aggregated data from across trading systems.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Unlocking Transparency in Private Markets: Data-Driven Strategies in Asset Management

As asset managers continue to increase their allocations in private assets, the demand for greater transparency, risk oversight, and operational efficiency is growing rapidly. Managing private markets data presents its own set of unique challenges due to a lack of transparency, disparate sources and lack of standardization. Without reliable access, your firm may face inefficiencies,...

BLOG

MiFIR Schema 1.4.0 Rollout: Testing Clarity Still Pending – April Deadline Remains

As of mid-February 2026, the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) MiFIR reporting webpage continues to indicate that a dedicated test environment for updated transparency messages would open in February, with exact dates to be confirmed in January. No detailed testing calendar has been published at the time of writing. The result is a compressed...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Summit in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions

Corporate actions has been a popular topic of discussion over the last few months, with the DTCC’s plans for XBRL and ISO interoperability, as well as the launch of Swift’s new self-testing service for corporate actions messaging, STaQS, among others. However, it has not been a good start to the year for many of the...