About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

MiFID II Response Depends On Organizing Data, Sticking To Exchanges

Subscribe to our newsletter

Transparency of financial market activity will be key to achieving compliance with MiFID II best execution provisions, states independent industry consultant Chris Pickles, who will be on a panel discussing data management under the European Union directive, at the Intelligent Trading Summit (ITS) to be hosted by A-Team Group in London on 2nd February.

“MiFID II is a fairly heavyweight tuning exercise,” says Pickles. “The regulators are gradually working their way through the learning process of what transparency is about.”

With the UK’s exit from the European Union proceeding, the UK will need to create regulations that are consistent with MiFID II as a directive — for UK markets to continue to transact cross-border trading with EU member countries. If Brexit had not proceeded, MiFID II’s related MiFIR regulation would have automatically applied to UK market activity.

“EU regulations are founded on an underlying belief that has built up over the last dozen years that trading must be done on an exchange for it to be transparent,” says Pickles, alluding to the approach that UK regulators will need to take to writing regulations consistent with MiFID II.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) construction of its Financial Instruments Reference Data System (FIRDS) will inevitably generate more data output, as Pickles says. The ITS session is set to cover the topic of “Keeping up with the data management deluge.”

“ESMA will have to carry a super set of all instruments because they have to regulate every single financial institution across the EU,” says Pickles. “They have to be the superset of all the banks, all the exchanges and all the OTC trading venues. There’s a massive reference database there.”

Generating more data, and then getting an organized reference database of that data, can lead to “the degree of transparency that’s needed across [European] markets,” he adds. This will also set up the data operations and compliance climate for an eventual “MiFID III” update of the EU directive, according to Pickles.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The Buy-side Trading Desk of the Future

The buy-side trading desk is facing a structural reckoning. Decades of siloed systems for equities, FX and fixed income have created what COOs increasingly describe as a “silo tax” – duplicated headcount, fragmented data, and operational overhead that is harder to justify now that the underlying workflows have, in functional terms, converged. Thirty years of...

BLOG

Modular vs Extensible Modular: Choosing Technology for Prediction Markets

By Daniel Davis, Chief Revenue Officer, Connamara Technologies. Ask most people how a new trading venue should approach its technology, and the answer comes back as a binary: build it yourself, or buy something off the shelf. Build, and you own everything, but you spend years getting to your first trade. Buy, and you launch...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the TradingTech Summit London brings together senior leadership across capital markets trading technology and market data. Join us to deep dive into key opportunities and challenges driving technological transformation across sell-side and buy-side firms.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...