About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

LEI Foundation Fixes Fees to be Paid by LOUs to Fund Global LEI System

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has fixed the licence fee that Local Operating Units (LOUs) must pay to the foundation for each LEI they issue at $20 a year. It has also introduced a member credit fee of $10 per LEI that LOUs must pay to the foundation to supplement funding of initial GLEIF operations, particularly the Central Operating System (COU) of the Global LEI System (GLEIS). Member credits, essentially short-term loans, will be returned to LOUs with interest, although no timeframe for repayment has been disclosed.

The LEI licence fees and member credit fees implement Recommendation 20 of the Financial Stability Board’s June 2012 report setting out recommendations for the establishment of the GLEIS. The ‘Sustainable Funding’ recommendation details the funding scheme of the global system as containing two components, ‘a local discretionary charge, and a common fee based on the number of registrations in each LOU to pay for the centralised operations in the COU, alongside any costs of implementing and sustaining the governance framework’.

The GLEIF has decided that licence and member credit fees will apply to all endorsed pre-LOUs and will cover all LEI activity from January 1, 2014. The licence fee, or ‘common fee’, to be paid by each LOU will be determined on an annual basis and will depend on the LOU’s LEI registration and renewal activity. For 2014, the annual period will run from January 1 to December 31.

The GLEIF says it expects LOUs may ultimately pass the cost of the licence fee on to LEI applicants in accordance with the cost recovery principles of the GLEIS. It concludes: “The application of this licence fee is in accordance with the principle of an efficient non-profit cost-recovery model. Any future adjustments to this licence fee may only occur in consultation with the Regulatory Oversight Committee [of the GLEIS] so as to ensure the GLEIF likewise operates in accordance with the cost recovery principles of the system and ensures fees are sufficiently modest so as not to act as a barrier to acquiring an LEI.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Taming the Private Markets Data Beast: Solving for Valuation, Integration, and Reporting in Alternative Investments

Available On-Demand Institutional activity in private markets has surged as organisations’ traditional investment theses have been upended by global economic volatility, geopolitical instability and fee compression. In their search for better risk-adjusted returns, they have found a rich seam of alpha from private equity and credit, real assets, venture and hedge funds, as well as...

BLOG

Finbourne Puts Even More Humans in the Loop to Build Client Confidence and Business

In an age when many firms are handing over ever more functions to artificial intelligence, Finbourne Technology is going all-out with investment in human engineers to take the company’s investment management data and technology capabilities to its customers. Finbourne has launched the Forward Deployment Engineering (FDE) programme in which it created a team of 30...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...