About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

LEI Foundation Fixes Fees to be Paid by LOUs to Fund Global LEI System

Subscribe to our newsletter

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has fixed the licence fee that Local Operating Units (LOUs) must pay to the foundation for each LEI they issue at $20 a year. It has also introduced a member credit fee of $10 per LEI that LOUs must pay to the foundation to supplement funding of initial GLEIF operations, particularly the Central Operating System (COU) of the Global LEI System (GLEIS). Member credits, essentially short-term loans, will be returned to LOUs with interest, although no timeframe for repayment has been disclosed.

The LEI licence fees and member credit fees implement Recommendation 20 of the Financial Stability Board’s June 2012 report setting out recommendations for the establishment of the GLEIS. The ‘Sustainable Funding’ recommendation details the funding scheme of the global system as containing two components, ‘a local discretionary charge, and a common fee based on the number of registrations in each LOU to pay for the centralised operations in the COU, alongside any costs of implementing and sustaining the governance framework’.

The GLEIF has decided that licence and member credit fees will apply to all endorsed pre-LOUs and will cover all LEI activity from January 1, 2014. The licence fee, or ‘common fee’, to be paid by each LOU will be determined on an annual basis and will depend on the LOU’s LEI registration and renewal activity. For 2014, the annual period will run from January 1 to December 31.

The GLEIF says it expects LOUs may ultimately pass the cost of the licence fee on to LEI applicants in accordance with the cost recovery principles of the GLEIS. It concludes: “The application of this licence fee is in accordance with the principle of an efficient non-profit cost-recovery model. Any future adjustments to this licence fee may only occur in consultation with the Regulatory Oversight Committee [of the GLEIS] so as to ensure the GLEIF likewise operates in accordance with the cost recovery principles of the system and ensures fees are sufficiently modest so as not to act as a barrier to acquiring an LEI.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

Financial Institutions ‘Layering’ New Risks as Report Highlights Greenwashing Exposure

The number of financial institutions flagged for greenwashing climbed substantially in the past year, highlighting both the vulnerability of individual firms and the need to integrate greenwashing risk management into decision-making processes.. The sector remained the worst offender for overstating their progress or making vague or misleading claims, the report by sustainability risk data company...

EVENT

TEST Event page 1

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Alternative Trading Systems Directory 2010

The year since we launched our first edition of the A-Team Alternative Trading Directory has passed by in a flash (no pun intended). And while the rate of expansion of the alternative trading system sector may have slowed – even consolidated somewhat – in the more established centres, their onward march continues both in terms of credibility, and of uptake...