About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Institutions Must Keep a Close Watch on Their Vendors, Says Credit Suisse’s Largier

Subscribe to our newsletter

Financial institutions need to be proactive in the management of their vendor relationships, said Peter Largier, global head of reference data analysis and projects at Credit Suisse. “You need to professionally evaluate the service you are getting from your data vendors,” he told delegates to FIMA 2008.

Largier focused his session on how to get the most out vendor relationships via the introduction of formal procedures and discussions. “There is a need for a formal RFP and you should ask for test data to check their product and market coverage,” he continued. “A range of considerations need to be taken into account when deciding on a data vendor, including areas such as the number of individual licenses needed, whether outsourcing providers and third parties have access to the data and contract expiry arrangements – will you still have access to the data you need once it has expired?”

However, the process does not stop there, once institutions have chosen a data provider, they must then carefully monitor the data produced. “Once you have signed up, you also need to regularly check up on service levels via meetings once a month,” Largier continued. He propounded the benefits of best practices in the area of vendor communication via a single global contact and a “partnership” approach.

“There should be a consolidated list of issues that are outstanding with regards to data across the institution and these should be fed back to vendors via a formal procedure on a monthly basis,” he said. “Actions must be set to improve the quality of data and the service in minuted meetings and these documents must be distributed to senior management to keep them abreast of developments.”

Dependencies on individual vendors must be limited via standardisation of interfaces and making sure that proprietary formats are kept to a minimum, he warned. “This means that if you have to change vendors, it is a much less complex procedure.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Generative and Agentic AI in Financial Markets: What the Data Really Shows

Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial markets – but the reality on the ground is more nuanced, more uneven, and more instructive than the headlines suggest. A new A-Team Insight research programme, drawing on responses from senior AI decision-makers at buy-side and sell-side institutions across the USA, UK and Canada, reveals a market in transition: from...

BLOG

Reconciliation No Longer Has Time On Its Side as T+1 Approaches

By John Bevil, senior product manager at Xceptor. Europe’s capital markets firms are entering the most consequential phase of T+1 preparation. From 11 October 2027, trades executed in European markets are expected to settle one business day after trade date, reducing the settlement cycle from T+2 to T+1. More than 4 trillion euros of securities...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the TradingTech Summit London brings together senior leadership across capital markets trading technology and market data. Join us to deep dive into key opportunities and challenges driving technological transformation across sell-side and buy-side firms.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...