About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Firms Failing to Meet MiFID II Reporting Requirements – Vendors Can Help

Subscribe to our newsletter

We are almost two years on from MiFID II implementation and yet there are still gaping holes where firms continue to struggle with the burden of mandatory reporting requirements brought in by the regulation. Around 50% are not yet monitoring their reporting daily, according to the second annual MiFID II & Best Execution survey from Cappitech, while almost two thirds (61.4%) are failing to monitor best execution, despite this being a key requirement.

The results show that even as we reach the regulation’s second birthday, firms are still struggling with reporting quality and processes. Key challenges include reconciliation, which 44% of firms identified as their primary pain point. Feedback is another – with over two thirds (68%) of respondents reporting that they have not yet received comments on MiFID II compliance from their national regulators. Of the 32% that have, none have yet been fined – but this relaxed approach is unlikely to last forever.

“The survey results point to firms still not being fully comfortable with MiFID II reporting requirements,” says Mark Kelly, author of the report and member of the Cappitech Advisory Board. “At the beginning of 2019, firms had told us that this year would be one of setting KPIs and reviewing data quality, but this process is clearly happening more slowly than anticipated. The use of external analysis and tools to spot problems may alleviate some of these challenges on the basis of ‘don’t mark your own homework’ which will be important as the regulators will start to impose sanctions on firms who are not managing their data appropriately.”

While 68% of firms plan to use existing reporting solutions for future regulatory requirements, a further 64% believe that it is important to have one solution across all reporting regimes, suggesting that there is a gradual move towards an enterprise-wide approach instead of the ‘fill-the-immediate-gaps’ model. But to meet the requirements, as the regulators begin to tighten their approach, it is crucial to engage with the correct counterparties to enable effective oversight.

“We believe that third party providers are a good way to overcome these challenges by providing domain expertise gained through dealing with many similar clients,” comments Ronen Kertis, CEO and Founder of Cappitech. “Using the right vendor also helps address the other clear preference raised by 64% of respondents saying it is important to streamline their reporting obligations by using a single solution or vendor.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Post-Trade Transformation: Automating Clearing & Settlement

Date: 1 December 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes The UK, EU and Swiss markets move to T+1 settlement on 11 October 2027, but the first binding compression arrives almost a year earlier. ESMA’s amended settlement discipline RTS expects allocation and confirmation completed by 23:00 CET on trade...

BLOG

SEC Proposes “Regulation Crypto Assets” to Address Digital Assets Innovation while Congress Moves Slowly on CLARITY Act

In a move that was somewhat surprising given its timing, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) unveiled a new regulatory proposal titled “Regulation Crypto Assets“ that is expected to have significant impact not only on those involved in launching native crypto assets but also for the general digital assets and tokenisation space. The SEC’s...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...