About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Talking Intelligent Trading with Andrew Delaney: It’s a MAD MAD / MAR MAR World

Subscribe to our newsletter

Here in Canary Wharf, at least, all of the ongoing fuss about Brexit distracted us from a key regulatory milestone: the introduction on July 4 for the EU’s Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), the real-life incarnation of its earlier foray into financial crime: the Market Abuse Directive (MAD).

We could all be forgiven for worrying about Brexit: it seems the merger of LSE and Deutsche Boerse is going ahead, at least for the time being; various Europeans have been making lots of noise about moving euro-denominated clearing from London; and in the past day or so French politicians have made it clear that they hope to make Paris the financial capital of the euro once the Brits are out.

Our sister publication – Data Management Review – this week launched a readers’ poll on the topic (we’ll do the same for Intelligent Trading Technology), and early results suggest our marketplace isn’t too optimistic about Brexit’s impact on London financial services and the wider financial data and technology community. With voting open for just a few days, some 90% of respondents believe Brexit will have a negative effect on commercial prospects, with many believing core functions will depart for greener pastures, with Frankfurt, Dublin and Paris leading the race.

But back to the matter in hand: MAR.

This was a topic of discussion at our recent Intelligent Trading Summit in New York, where panellists suggested its impact could be perhaps more far-reaching than some in the marketplace believe. Indeed, one of our panellists – OneMarketData’s Dermot Hariss – suggests that MAR could be the catalyst for a more holistic approach for firms’ seeking broader regulatory compliance.

In his discussions with clients, Hariss believes many are looking to see how they can leverage their ‘tactical’ MAR solutions to launch more strategic solutions to the likes of MiFID II, EMIR and BCBS 239. Indeed, some aspects of MAR compliance won’t become clear until MiFID II has been finalised, and this may have implications for how trading firms store and organise their transaction data for future access in response to regulators’ queries.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Valuations for CLOs

This webinar has passed, but you can view the recording here. MAKE DECISIONS WITH CONFIDENCE Financial services firms need access to accurate, transparent and complete data in order to meet complex business demands. Bloomberg understands these challenges, and is committed to providing innovative enterprise solutions and expert service. Cynthia Sachs, Global Head of BVAL Product...

BLOG

Adverse Media Screening Moves From Search to Risk Intelligence

Financial institutions have accepted adverse media screening as a core element of financial crime compliance, but the next challenge is more exacting: proving that the right entity is being screened, across the right sources, with a decision trail that can withstand scrutiny. That is the operational issue beneath Ripjar’s report, The State of Adverse Media...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Summit in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...