About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Talking Intelligent Trading with Andrew Delaney: It’s a MAD MAD / MAR MAR World

Subscribe to our newsletter

Here in Canary Wharf, at least, all of the ongoing fuss about Brexit distracted us from a key regulatory milestone: the introduction on July 4 for the EU’s Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), the real-life incarnation of its earlier foray into financial crime: the Market Abuse Directive (MAD).

We could all be forgiven for worrying about Brexit: it seems the merger of LSE and Deutsche Boerse is going ahead, at least for the time being; various Europeans have been making lots of noise about moving euro-denominated clearing from London; and in the past day or so French politicians have made it clear that they hope to make Paris the financial capital of the euro once the Brits are out.

Our sister publication – Data Management Review – this week launched a readers’ poll on the topic (we’ll do the same for Intelligent Trading Technology), and early results suggest our marketplace isn’t too optimistic about Brexit’s impact on London financial services and the wider financial data and technology community. With voting open for just a few days, some 90% of respondents believe Brexit will have a negative effect on commercial prospects, with many believing core functions will depart for greener pastures, with Frankfurt, Dublin and Paris leading the race.

But back to the matter in hand: MAR.

This was a topic of discussion at our recent Intelligent Trading Summit in New York, where panellists suggested its impact could be perhaps more far-reaching than some in the marketplace believe. Indeed, one of our panellists – OneMarketData’s Dermot Hariss – suggests that MAR could be the catalyst for a more holistic approach for firms’ seeking broader regulatory compliance.

In his discussions with clients, Hariss believes many are looking to see how they can leverage their ‘tactical’ MAR solutions to launch more strategic solutions to the likes of MiFID II, EMIR and BCBS 239. Indeed, some aspects of MAR compliance won’t become clear until MiFID II has been finalised, and this may have implications for how trading firms store and organise their transaction data for future access in response to regulators’ queries.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating a Complex World: Best Data Practices in Sanctions Screening

As rising geopolitical uncertainty prompts an intensification in the complexity and volume of global economic and financial sanctions, banks and financial institutions are faced with a daunting set of new compliance challenges. The risk of inadvertently engaging with sanctioned securities has never been higher and the penalties for doing so are harsh. Traditional sanctions screening...

BLOG

When 1% Breaks the Fund: The Sanctions Contagion Facing ETF Issuers

Roy Kirby, Head of Core Products at SIX Group, has spent the past four years watching sanctions transform from episodic geopolitical tools into a structural feature of market risk. In sharing insights with RegTech Insight, he sets out how the acceleration and layering of sanctions since 2022 are reshaping compliance obligations for ETF issuers and,...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit New York

Our TradingTech Summit in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions

Corporate actions has been a popular topic of discussion over the last few months, with the DTCC’s plans for XBRL and ISO interoperability, as well as the launch of Swift’s new self-testing service for corporate actions messaging, STaQS, among others. However, it has not been a good start to the year for many of the...