About a-team Marketing Services
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Stick provides carrot for data community

Subscribe to our newsletter

It seems that the threat of greater regulatory involvement has spurred on a flurry of activity and innovation in the data community over the last few months. As institutions’ IT purse strings have tightened and closer scrutiny has been paid to areas such as counterparty risk and fair value pricing, vendors have upped their game accordingly.

Not only have valuations become the next big thing, with every vendor in the space either expanding to new areas of coverage, or upgrading their platforms, but these same vendors have also been pushing to get involved in the regulatory dialogue itself. Following the passing of the Federal Reserve and US Treasury’s troubled asset relief programme (Tarp) earlier in October, Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg indicated that they wish to play a direct role in the programme. The vendors are keen to get involved in the area of pricing and risk management in particular, with a view to increasing transparency. They feel they can add much needed transparency to the valuation of the illiquid securities that may be traded by Tarp. Both Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters have publicly stated their intention to get involved in the scheme thus far and many other vendors have been talking up the need for fair value pricing and transparency. Of course, beyond Tarp, the vendor community has also been swept up in the changes happening to the credit derivatives market and the ongoing race between the credit default swap (CDS) clearing house contenders. Players such as CME Group, IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) and Eurex have all elaborated further on their respective plans (see this month’s lead story), although as yet it is unclear what long term impact this will have on the valuations community. Furthermore, if a turf war between the clearing house candidates wasn’t enough, the industry is also witnessing a regulatory battle of the titans, as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) goes head to head to head with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) over regulatory jurisdiction. Bart Chilton, commissioner of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), has repeatedly stated that oversight of the CDS sector should remain under the jurisdiction of the commodity futures regulator. However, there have been calls in the past for the SEC’s role to be expanded to cover the regulation of swaps and these have recently been reiterated. At the start of the month, Republican Edward Markey reintroduced a bill that would expand the SEC’s coverage of derivatives. Currently, swaps are not defined as securities because they are traded off exchange so do not fall under the SEC’s remit. Although there has been no direct decision made by the US government about whether regulatory oversight should fall under the remit of either party in the long run, there have been discussions about CFTC’s regulatory scope in particular. The recent hearings of the House and Senate agriculture committees, which have jurisdiction over the CFTC, came to the conclusion that OTC derivatives are in need of much stronger regulation: no big surprise there then. Tom Harkin, chairman of the Senate agriculture committee hearing, said that it will “revisit and examine very carefully how these financial swaps and derivatives are regulated”, indicating that it will be some time still before a solution is achieved. The industry isn’t just burdened with the pressures of regulatory scrutiny and coping with economic instability, however; it also has to deal with the ongoing challenge of adapting to long-planned changes in the market, such as the Options Symbology Initiative (OSI) due to be implemented by 2010. As with the CDS sector, there is a fair amount of uncertainty in the market about the future of the initiative and how to move forward with the OSI. This lack of clarity across the industry is likely to lead to problems further down the line and it seems that despite the reputational and operational risk that is posed by a lack of standardisation – as proved by other sectors recently – the fire fighting will continue.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Adding value and improving efficiencies in sanctions screening

Sanctions have been headline news this year. They are growing in number, sanctions lists are changing on a daily basis, and there can be conflict between sanctions issued by different jurisdictions – the whole calling for financial institutions to optimise sanctions screening to reduce risk and avoid potentially punitive penalties of non-compliance. This webinar will...

BLOG

How to Source and Manage ESG Disclosure Data to Ensure Compliance

Huge steps have been made in recent years to bring environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting standards up to the level of reported financial information – but there is still a long way to go. A shortage of company data, a lack of harmonisation on standards, and the sheer volume of data being pumped out...

EVENT

ESG Insight Briefing New York

The briefing will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data, how to apply new technologies to improve data quality and insight and the impact of regulatory measures on standardisation efforts.

GUIDE

ESG Data Handbook 2022

The ESG landscape is changing faster than anyone could have imagined even five years ago. With tens of trillions of dollars expected to have been committed to sustainable assets by the end of the decade, it’s never been more important for financial institutions of all sizes to stay abreast of changes in the ESG data...