About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Quantifi Stresses Data Management Requirement for Basel III Credit Risk

Subscribe to our newsletter

Quantifi has built out its counterparty credit risk platform to meet the capital requirements of Basel III. But the company warns that data aggregation and management coupled to a centralised approach to the regulation are essential to full compliance and managing the cost of capital.

Basel III regulation was finalised in June 2011 and will be implemented into law in the European Union by the Capital Requirements Directive IV. Despite a postponement in bringing the regulation into force from January 2013 to January 2019, Quantifi says banks subject to the regulation should be looking now at how they will achieve compliance.

Dmitry Pugachevsky, director of research at Quantifi, says that whether they are building or buying Basel III solutions, banks should be bringing together all the data needed to calculate counterparty credit risk capital charges, including credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk capital charges, centrally to achieve the best capital results. He also encourages use of the same data and models for both regulatory and trading systems to ensure consistency and ease compliance.

The company works predominantly with tier two banks and has been using used its counterparty credit risk engine to run CVA capital charges calculations across retail, commercial and investment bank portfolios. The aim is to identify which calculation methods, perhaps the internal model method or advanced method, deliver the best outcomes in terms of lower capital charges.

The work suggests the best performing methods are the internal model method for Basel II risk weighted assets and the advanced method for Basel III CVA risk capital charges. Quantifi states: “This result confirms that implementing sophisticated Monte Carlo models and getting regulatory approvals can save significant amounts of capital.” The company also refutes market opinion suggesting that Basel II counterparty credit risk capital charges are much lower than those required by Basel III, noting that charges can be similar depending on the methods used in calculation.

Quantifi’s Basel III solution uses the same software as its Basel II offering, albeit with slightly different data, managing both credit and market risk on the platform and taking into account issues such as collateral management and cross-product netting agreements. Calculations are made in real time and an integrated reporting system allows users to drill down into the data to discover the effects of particular counterparties or trades on capital charges.

Pugachevsky acknowledges market competitors such as Murex and Calypso, but suggests Quantifi provides an enterprise risk system with a more user friendly front-office element that not only delivers real-time data, but also a relatively easy to use solution for sensitivities and scenario creation. However, even with a risk system in place, he repeats that the opportunity to reduce capital requirements remains a function of the collection of high quality, aggregated data from across trading systems.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to simplify and modernize data architecture to unleash data value and innovation

The data needs of financial institutions are growing at pace as new formats and greater volumes of information are integrated into their systems. With this has come greater complexity in managing and governing that data, amplifying pain points along data pipelines. In response, innovative new streamlined and flexible architectures have emerged that can absorb and...

BLOG

Navigating Divergent AI Regulation – Can Standards Bring Clarity?

Artificial intelligence is transforming financial services, from automating credit assessments to streamlining compliance processes. But while AI capabilities are developing at pace, regulatory frameworks are struggling to keep up. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the contrasting approaches taken by the European Union and the United Kingdom. The EU has opted for a rules-heavy,...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 15th year the Data Management Summit NYC brings together the North American data management community to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2025 – Thirteenth Edition

Welcome to the thirteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a unique and practical guide to capital markets regulation, regulatory change, and the data and data management requirements of compliance across Europe, the UK, US and Asia-Pacific. This year’s edition lands at a moment of accelerating regulatory divergence and intensifying data focused supervision. Inside,...