About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Principia Exposes Gaps in Structured Finance Investors’ Risk Oversight as ABS and MBS Trading Increases

Subscribe to our newsletter

Principia Partners, a solution provider for the management and administration of structured finance investments, today announced the findings of its structured finance investor due diligence survey. The results highlight increasing investor and issuer confidence in securitisation as an asset class, with 60% of investors stating they would increase their activity within the next 12 months. However, while trading activity is set to increase, analytical, risk oversight and operational challenges remain a major concern for financial institutions and asset managers. Investors often conceded that they were less than effective at performing the necessary level of due diligence required for continued investment in structured finance securities.

Over 500 senior securitisation market participants from 200 organisations took part in the study between June and September 2010. 90% of the investors that responded stated that over the next two years their organisations had plans to implement technology to improve analytical, risk and operational processes to overcome challenges in managing ABS, MBS and structured credit investment portfolios.

Investors selected and ranked the investment analysis, risk surveillance and operational requirements they saw as most critical to compliance with regulatory due diligence requirements in the next 12 months. They also provided insight into how well they currently performed against these key criteria.

The most important objective identified by investors was timely access and effective integration of collateral pool performance data for investment and risk analysis. This was followed by the effective modelling of deal waterfall structures and cashflows for all the assets managed within a given portfolio. Although recognised as critical activities, 54% of all the investors surveyed stated that they were ineffective at accessing and monitoring performance data for the securities they held, or those they planned to invest in. This includes an inability to monitor pool performance measures that must be tracked for capital relief under the Basel II Securitisation Framework Enhancements, such as delinquency, default, recovery and prepayment rates. Similarly, over 50% of investors stated that they were not effective at modelling deal structures and cashflow behaviour within their systems, hindering forecasting, ongoing valuations and stress testing.

“We have not performed well in these areas given a lack of information and systems to accomplish the necessary level of analysis and oversight. Systems limitations are still a primary shortcoming,” stated a Managing Director, Credit Investment at a global bank based in the US. “A lack of focus to implement a global system for structured finance continues and manual entries are still needed to pull together the broad coverage and data required for all our exposures.”

Other key findings from the survey include:

· 75% of investors ranked the consolidated risk surveillance of portfolio, deal, tranche and collateral pool performance in their top two risk management concerns. 55% stated they were not effective at addressing this concern.

· 72% of investors said they were ineffective at establishing and monitoring hard and soft triggers related to structured finance assets

· Only 35% of investors felt they effectively managed their global structured finance exposures in a single integrated environment.

“Investors are cognizant of new due diligence requirements and their need to address the shortfalls in analytical, risk management and operational practices before new rules are enforced in 2011. Even with greater issuer disclosure, understanding new deals will be an intensive task without the right tools and operations in place. Worse, it can lead to misinformed investment decisions, capital penalties or being priced out of the market altogether,” stated Douglas Long, EVP Business Strategy at Principia. “These results further validate Principia’s product development over the last two years and will help us continue to deliver the most comprehensive front to back office functionality demanded by structured finance investors.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: GenAI and LLM case studies for Surveillance, Screening and Scanning

As Generative AI (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) move from pilot to production, compliance, surveillance, and screening functions are seeing tangible results – and new risks. From trade surveillance to adverse media screening to policy and regulatory scanning, GenAI and LLMs promise to tackle complexity and volume at a scale never seen before. But...

BLOG

Droit Launches Decision Decoder: Making Regulatory Decisions Legible at Scale

Explainability has become one of the defining challenges in regulatory technology. As compliance engines scale to millions of decisions per day, firms (and supervisors) are no longer satisfied with binary answers alone. They need to understand why a rule applied, how a conclusion was reached, and where that logic traces back to the source text...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York

Now in its 9th year, the RegTech Summit in New York will bring together the RegTech ecosystem to explore how the North American capital markets financial industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Corporate Actions USA 2010

The US corporate actions market has long been characterised as paper-based and manually intensive, but it seems that much progress is being made of late to tackle the lack of automation due to the introduction of four little letters: XBRL. According to a survey by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and standards...