It was just a dozen years ago that the first stablecoins emerged. The first entrants were BitUSD, a crypto-backed coin, and Realcoin, which was fiat backed. While BitUSD lasted just a few years, Realcoin – which quickly rebranded to Tether – became the undisputed leader in a space now valued at more than $300 billion.
Industry analysts expect the stablecoin market to reach $1 trillion in 2028, and while Tether is likely to remain the market leader, it faces increasing competition not only from current competitors like Circle, but also from new entrants, including Open USD, backed by Visa, BlackRock and 140+ other major companies and due to launch later this year.
The stablecoin landscape is far from settled, with more than 200 distinct coins vying for market share. Today, a multi-layered financial evolution is taking place: institutions are laying down the rails for widespread B2B deployment under clearer regulatory guardrails, while consumer-facing retail adoption is already surging. And the true wild card lies in the near-ish future, when an army of AI agents could scale stablecoin adoption to heights that traditional payment networks have never seen.Whatever the market segment being considered, financial institutions are set to be major participants in some way, and many are already making early moves in the space. So it’s timely that A-Team Group has just published a white paper – commissioned by Apex Group – to provide some early pointers to adoption and implementation.
Download the white paper The institutional adoption of stablecoins: Strategic value, challenges, and implementation frameworks for free here.
Institutions already understand the potential benefits of embracing stablecoins: low-cost, global, 24/7, frictionless and instantaneous transfers of value. Stablecoins bypass existing payment networks, remove the need to fund correspondent bank accounts, and deliver funds in seconds. These benefits alone – translated into more efficient use of capital, reduced risk and improved operational experiences – are compelling reasons to adopt them.
Stablecoins are also enabling Wall Street 2.0, where real-world tokenised assets are traded on chain with real-time compliance checks, taking advantage of the abundant liquidity of decentralised markets. All with stablecoins delivering instant settlement funding to reduce risk, while generating yield on their underlying collateral assets.
But benefits generally come with some challenges and decision points, and stablecoins have a few. Hence the need for a structured framework for implementation. The first foundational decision is to choose between issuing a proprietary stablecoin or leveraging established coins like USDT or USDC.
Issuing a proprietary coin provides significant revenue opportunities from reserve assets but demands infrastructure development, ongoing 24/7 technical oversight, and rigorous regulatory integration. Conversely, leveraging existing stablecoins or using stablecoin-as-a-service providers allows businesses faster time to market and lower operational overhead, but with less control and limited revenue attached.
In addition, implementation teams need to proactively manage integration challenges, particularly regarding legacy technology stacks – such as accounting systems and payment applications that were not built to understand on-chain currencies. As a result, institutions are generally required to form risk committees to consider operational risks and possible capital losses.
Regulatory compliance planning needs to align with the 24/7 and real-time nature of stablecoins. End-of-day checks and balances won’t cut it for always-on autonomous finance. Instead, compliance rules need to be directly embedded into tokenised assets programmatically, leveraging permissioned token standards, such as ERC-3643, linked to on-chain identity regimes and compliance oracles.
This functionality can deliver real-time Know Your Customer (KYC) and sanctions screening checks directly inside a token’s smart contract, preventing illegal transfers and enabling token recovery if regulators require it.
Finally, organisations should avoid assigning stablecoin strategies to overly large, slow-moving committees. Operational execution should instead be driven by smaller, empowered agile units. Appointing a single product manager, an engineering leader, and a market execution head ensures clean project accountability.
Partnering with established global professional services providers can further align digital asset operations with governance best practices, successfully bridging legacy workflows into the modern tokenised economy.
Subscribe to our newsletter
