About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

BISS Research Adds STP and Risk Measurements to Corporate Actions Benchmarking

Subscribe to our newsletter

In a climate where metrics seem to be ever more important, BISS Research is seeking to capitalise on this focus in data management with an upgrade of its benchmarking service for corporate actions vendors. For obvious reasons, risk management and STP have become key drivers for investment in the space (reducing headcounts and regulatory scrutiny being two such reasons), and BISS Research has duly added these factors to its benchmarking service.

Gary Wright, CEO of BISS Research, claims the service is “the only truly independent research company to focus on raising the standards in worldwide corporate actions.” In accordance with this claim of independence, he indicates that feedback from those involved in the benchmarking report has been the impetus for the addition of these new categories.

“We noted that there was an overwhelming demand for a greater concentration on core processes to achieve STP. As a result we have spent some considerable time revamping the questionnaire with our benchmarking panel” he explains. “A secondary request was to try and measure the risks within the corporate actions processes and quantify the benefits of systems in reducing them.”

Wright reckons this new questionnaire will set the bar higher for software vendors involved in the benchmarking process. “We will shortly announce the first vendors who have already committed to participate in this years corporate actions benchmarking,” he adds.

The idea of a benchmarked service is certainly appealing to the data community at large; discussions at last year’s FIMA in London focused on the need for metrics in order to get senior management buy in. This is especially the case when times are tough and departments have to go the extra mile to get funding for projects. However, how much these benchmarks hold water when under scrutiny by financial institutions is another matter.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The Data Office at a Crossroads — AI Governance, Organisational Design, and the Evolving Mandate of the CDO

Who owns AI governance in a capital markets firm – and is the Data Office structured to bear that weight? These questions sit at the heart of A-Team Research’s latest findings, presented here for the first time: the combined results of two landmark surveys examining the role of the Data Office in AI governance and...

BLOG

SEC and CFTC Recalibrate Private Fund Reporting for Systemic Risk Oversight

The SEC and CFTC have proposed a substantial reset of Form PF, raising reporting thresholds and streamlining requirements for private fund advisers while preserving supervisory access to data on the largest and most systemically relevant managers. The proposed rule would lift the general filing threshold from $150 million to $1 billion in private fund assets...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Spring, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 9th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2026 – Fourteenth Edition

Welcome to the fourteenth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook. Supervisors increasingly expect firms to demonstrate which rules apply, which data supports each obligation, who owns the control and how exceptions are identified and resolved. Policies and implementation programmes must now be supported by records that can withstand regulatory scrutiny. This edition examines material...