About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

BISS Research Adds STP and Risk Measurements to Corporate Actions Benchmarking

Subscribe to our newsletter

In a climate where metrics seem to be ever more important, BISS Research is seeking to capitalise on this focus in data management with an upgrade of its benchmarking service for corporate actions vendors. For obvious reasons, risk management and STP have become key drivers for investment in the space (reducing headcounts and regulatory scrutiny being two such reasons), and BISS Research has duly added these factors to its benchmarking service.

Gary Wright, CEO of BISS Research, claims the service is “the only truly independent research company to focus on raising the standards in worldwide corporate actions.” In accordance with this claim of independence, he indicates that feedback from those involved in the benchmarking report has been the impetus for the addition of these new categories.

“We noted that there was an overwhelming demand for a greater concentration on core processes to achieve STP. As a result we have spent some considerable time revamping the questionnaire with our benchmarking panel” he explains. “A secondary request was to try and measure the risks within the corporate actions processes and quantify the benefits of systems in reducing them.”

Wright reckons this new questionnaire will set the bar higher for software vendors involved in the benchmarking process. “We will shortly announce the first vendors who have already committed to participate in this years corporate actions benchmarking,” he adds.

The idea of a benchmarked service is certainly appealing to the data community at large; discussions at last year’s FIMA in London focused on the need for metrics in order to get senior management buy in. This is especially the case when times are tough and departments have to go the extra mile to get funding for projects. However, how much these benchmarks hold water when under scrutiny by financial institutions is another matter.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: MiFID II – Research Unbundling, Permissioning and Commission Sharing Arrangements

MiFID II makes sweeping changes to the investment market’s research regime, requiring unbundling and implementing new requirements around permissioning and commission sharing arrangements. This webinar will discuss data, solutions and services needed to segregate research consumption in accordance with MiFID II. It will also consider how practitioners are powering research related workflows, applications and business...

BLOG

Record Debt Issuance Is Exposing The Bond Market’s Information Gap

By Swati Bhatia, head of fixed income, financial information at SIX. Sovereign bond issuance across the OECD’s member countries is predicted to have reach a record US$17 trillion at the end of last year, a scale of borrowing that would have seemed mind-boggling only a few years ago. On the corporate debt side, the total...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...