About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A Dive into the Detail of the Financial Data Transparency Act’s Data Standards Requirements

Subscribe to our newsletter

As the June 2024 deadline looms for US regulators within the scope of the Financial Data Transparency Act (FTDA) to provide joint rules on data standards and reporting formats, the question of what these standards and formats will be remains open. Front runners are the Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) and eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL), but nothing is certain and whatever the outcome, timelines are tight with final rules to be published in December 2024 ahead of regulatory agencies fully adopting the standards by 2026.

FTDA was signed into law by President Biden in December 2022. The act intends to streamline the process of reporting by creating uniform standards and eliminating proprietary formats that slow down reporting and create inconsistencies across regulatory agencies.

While regulators will agree the standards, financial institutions must also respond to the regulation by implementing said standards, essentially moving away from paper-based forms and proprietary data formats to electronic reporting and open source formats.

Regulators within scope of FDTA are the: Federal Reserve; Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA); National Credit Union Administration (NCUA); Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB).

An opportunity for the LEI

The act is a major undertaking for regulators and regulated firms. It is also an opportunity for the LEI, if selected, to move to another level in the US, which has been slow to adopt the identifier, and significantly increase numbers that will strengthen the Global LEI System.

While industry experts suggest regulators in scope of FDTA, collectively called Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) agencies, initially considered data standards including the LEI and Financial Instrument Global Identifier published by Bloomberg, they suggest the LEI is the best match for the regulation’s requirements for ‘Covered agencies to establish “common identifiers” for information reported to covered regulatory agencies, which could include transactions and financial products/instruments.” The act specifically requires the adoption of a common, non-proprietary, open license, machine readable legal entity identifier.

If the LEI is named in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in June 2024 and mandated in the final rules due for publication in December 2024, it could be implemented relatively easily as both regulators and financial institutions are cognizant of the identifier, many financial institutions use the identifier, and it will not replace but rather become a mandatory addition to existing identifiers.

A challenge for XBRL

The selection and implementation of a reporting taxonomy is more challenging as it will require many of the regulators to abandon existing reporting practices often based on PDFs, text and CSV files, and replace these with electronic reporting and machine-readable tagging. XBRL fits the bill, say industry experts, although there has been pushback from some agencies that see the unfunded requirement for change as too great a burden.

The June 2024 joint agency standards rules will answer these questions and be open to industry consultation, ahead of the final rules being published in December 2024. Meantime, financial firms in scope of FDTA need to review their data management and reporting processes. If they do not have software that aligns with the principles of the act – data searchability, transparency and standardisation – now is the time to look for a solution that will comply with requirements.

Find out more about FDTA in A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing Non-Financial Misconduct Under SMCR

Non-financial misconduct – encompassing behaviours such as bullying, sexual harassment, and discrimination is a key focus of the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR). The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has underscored that such misconduct is not only unethical but also poses significant risks to a firm’s culture and operational integrity. Recognizing the profound impact on...

BLOG

FCA Multi-Firm Review on Off-Channel Communications: Implications and Next Steps

By Paul Cottee, Director, Regulatory Compliance, NICE Actimize. The UK’s financial regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), recently published the results of its multi-firm review into off-channel communications within wholesale banking. Off-channel communications, in this context, refer to any professional communication that occurs outside of the firm’s approved channels, such as personal emails, instant messages,...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, London, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 8th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

The DORA Implementation Playbook: A Practitioner’s Guide to Demonstrating Resilience Beyond the Deadline

The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) has fundamentally reshaped the European Union’s financial regulatory landscape, with its full application beginning on January 17, 2025. This regulation goes beyond traditional risk management, explicitly acknowledging that digital incidents can threaten the stability of the entire financial system. As the deadline has passed, the focus is now shifting...