About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Being Smart About Being Fast – One Speed Does Not Fit All

Subscribe to our newsletter

As the trading landscape has undergone significant changes over the last several years, financial institutions have developed an insatiable need for low latency. Infrastructures that once had to handle a maximum of 50 trades per second, now must process thousands  – an increase of more than 1,900%. However, aiming to gain the lowest latency possible should not necessarily be your firm’s goal. To succeed in the current environment, you need to have a good understanding of latency within your own infrastructure first and not simply engage in a blind pursuit of ultra-low latency.

Depending on your company’s trading goals, obviously, having the shortest line from point A to point B can be a major advantage.  However, it opens up new, more complex strategies that are not ideal in a high-latency environment and can also slow you down if used incorrectly.

Be an Educated Latency Consumer

In order to find the right latency strategy for your firm, consider the below three points:

1. Be educated – identify your ideas and strategies, outline the execution and the final goal.

2. Don’t be held hostage to the hype – ultra-low latency may be the topic du jour, however, it might not be right for you.

3. Learn to manage speeds – in order to reach optimal solution you need to be able to adapt and be open to exploring all options.

Firstly, you need to map out the latency that is built into every platform and every intermediary system that your orders go through. Once you have a better picture of the route your order takes from entry through execution, you can start to manage your direct market access (DMA), which gives you the ability to mix manual and electronic trading strategies based on your ultimate investment goals.

Remember, no matter what you do, the drive to cut latency is here to stay. With this in mind, you want to make sure that you do not become a hostage to latency and the illusion of unachievably high speeds. Most firms don’t need low latency, they are just position takers that want to say they have it for the sake of having it.

There are some fund managers that pay a lot of money for an ultra-low latency infrastructure, but in reality all they need is relatively good latency. They can get that through one of the intermediaries that come very well equipped and “free” – that is, paid for through their commissions.

There are a lot of misconceptions about low and ultra-low latency – people think that they can beat the speed of light, which is impossible. When you’re situated in the US and routing through Tokyo and Europe, your order takes longer to deliver and you have to factor that into your plan. That means, potentially, putting an office in these regions. But either way, you need to know if you’re trading long-haul, over a significant stretch of network, when you will lose execution speed. Either de-concentrate your trading or integrate what you know about latency into your trading strategy.

Finally, if you have all these elements, it comes down to managing latency properly. This means understanding what you are facing and knowing how to leverage it to your advantage. Don’t try to build from scratch if you can already find a high quality algorithm integrated with latency at the core. Know what everyone is offering and adapt that to your own needs for the ultimate results. When you’re deciding on the latency of your infrastructure, tread carefully. The right solution and answer varies for everyone, there is no one-speed-fits-all solution.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

Buy or Build? Trade Surveillance Software’s Oldest Question Has New Stakes

By Nolan Schiff, Chief Solutions Officer, Eventus. It’s a question nearly as old as enterprise software itself: should you pay a vendor to deliver your technology, or dedicate internal resources to building and maintaining it yourself? For trade surveillance, it’s a decision that requires weighing cost against control, performance against customization and the speed of...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

Applications of Reference Data to the Middle Office

Increasing volumes and the complexity of reference data in the post-crisis environment have left the middle office struggling to meet the requirements of the current market order. Middle office functions must therefore be robust enough to be able to deal with the spectre of globalisation, an increase in the use of esoteric security types and...