Optimal Market Technologies the US-registered broker-dealer focused on options execution, has launched a new US listed options execution platform backed by several leading global market makers, introducing a model designed to allocate order flow based on measured execution performance rather than fixed or single-counterparty arrangements.
The platform combines an options Alternative Trading System (ATS) with routing tools and algorithmic capabilities, positioning itself as both a venue and an execution layer within the options market structure. At launch, multiple Primary Market Makers (PMMs) are participating, creating a framework in which liquidity providers compete simultaneously for order flow based on defined execution metrics.The approach introduces a structured competition mechanism into a segment of the U.S. options market where retail flow has historically been concentrated among a relatively small group of dominant wholesalers.
Embedding Performance into Allocation Mechanics
At the centre of the model is a competition-based allocation structure under which multiple market makers compete for retail options flow. Execution quality is assessed on a name-by-name basis using rolling performance measures, with allocation adjusted periodically according to relative outcomes.
By linking order allocation to measured performance, the platform seeks to formalise execution quality as an operational determinant of flow distribution. For brokers, this raises practical considerations around routing logic, analytics integration and best execution monitoring.
If allocation becomes dynamically linked to execution outcomes, smart order routing frameworks may need to incorporate additional performance feedback loops. This could influence how brokers evaluate liquidity provider performance over time and how they demonstrate best execution to clients and regulators.
Liquidity Backing and Competitive Positioning
One of the more significant aspects of the launch is the level of liquidity provider commitment at inception. Participation by established global market makers promises immediate quoting depth and competitive credibility, reducing the “cold start” challenges that have constrained some previous venue launches.
Such early liquidity backing signals operational seriousness and lowers initial execution risk for brokers evaluating connectivity. For institutional participants, the presence of multiple established firms competing within a defined allocation model may provide an additional layer of resilience relative to single-counterparty arrangements.
However, long-term sustainability will depend not only on liquidity participation but also on whether the performance measurement framework is regarded as transparent, consistent and robust.
Execution Quality Under Market Scrutiny
The timing of the launch is notable. US retail options execution continues to attract attention around order flow concentration, pricing transparency and best execution oversight.
By embedding execution quality assessment directly into allocation mechanics, the platform introduces a more explicit performance incentive structure among liquidity providers. In principle, this may align quoting behaviour more closely with measured outcomes.
That said, the announcement does not specify how execution quality is defined, benchmarked or independently validated. Metrics such as price improvement, realised spread, fill speed or volatility-adjusted performance are not detailed, nor is the governance framework surrounding measurement and review.
For compliance, risk and execution oversight teams, these elements will be central to evaluating whether the model enhances transparency or simply reshapes existing incentives within a different structural wrapper.
Operational and Integration Considerations
While the structural concept is clearly articulated in the release, technical and operational details are limited. The announcement does not elaborate on OMS or EMS integration pathways, FIX or API connectivity standards, latency profile, co-location arrangements, clearing mechanics or fee structures.
For trading technologists, these factors will determine how readily the platform can be integrated into existing execution stacks and whether it alters cost and infrastructure dynamics.
As with any new execution venue or routing layer, adoption will depend on operational simplicity, measurable performance improvement and clear economic alignment.
A Structural Development to Monitor
The launch represents more than the debut of another options trading venue. It introduces a formalised competition framework for retail options order allocation, backed by established liquidity providers and anchored in performance-based measurement.
Whether the model gains traction will depend on broker adoption, the credibility and transparency of its execution quality metrics, and the competitive response of incumbent wholesalers.
If performance-linked allocation becomes embedded in routing policy and regulatory discourse, the implications could extend beyond a single platform, influencing how execution quality is measured, monitored and rewarded across the broader US options market structure.
Subscribe to our newsletter
