The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Zeptonics Hit By Legal Ruling; Cannot Sell Ultra-Low-Latency Products

Australian financial trading technology vendor Zeptonics has been directed by the Federal Court of Australia to assign the ownership of certain of its products – including its ZeptoLink fanout device and ZeptoMatch matching engine – to proprietary trading firm Zomojo, which claimed ownership of them. It is considering appealing the decision, but for now it cannot sell them or support any companies using or evaluating them.

Zomojo claimed – and the court ruled – that ownership of ZeptoLink, ZeptoMatch (a matching engine), ZeptoNIC (a network interface card) and ZeptoAccess KRX (a trading gateway for the Korean Stock Exchange) resided with itself. As such, Zeptonics is not allowed to sell or support the use of those products. Zeptonics previously announced sales of ZeptoLink and its ZeptoMux switch to a Chicago-based trading firm, and say that “around half of the world’s top ten proprietary trading firms, have been in the process of trialing” its technology.

ZeptoMux – a many-to-one multiplexer with latency of 130 nanoseconds – is not covered by the ruling.

Without getting into all of the background and detail – the court ruling runs to 183 pages – at the heart of the dispute is Zeptonics founder Matthew Hurd, who worked at Zomojo for several years as its co-managing director and head of IT development.

Essentially, Hurd became unhappy working at Zomojo and left the company early in 2011, founding Zeptonics around the same time. Zomojo claims that Zeptonics’ technology is based on that developed by Hurd while he worked for it.

Zeptonics says that it believes it has “substantial grounds for appeal,” but has not determined whether to take that route. For its part, Zomojo does not seem interested in becoming a technology vendor, and is seeking the return of ZeptoLink devices installed at other trading firms.

The moral of the story: considerable due diligence is required when buying technology, especially when it is cutting edge from niche vendors, and likely to provide a real advantage.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Best Practice for trade surveillance

Don’t miss this opportunity to view the recording of this recently held webinar. Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), Dodd-Frank and other regulations underline the need for effective and timely trade surveillance to counter market abuse. The webinar will discuss regulatory requirements for trade surveillance, best practice implementation, technology...

BLOG

A-Team Group Names 2021 TradingTech Insight Europe Award Winners

A-Team Group today announced the winners of its TradingTech Insight (TTI) Europe Awards. The awards celebrate excellence in trading solutions and services for capital markets and focus on vendors providing exceptional trading infrastructure, trading technology, and data solutions. This year’s awards included two special editor’s awards. The Editor’s Recognition Award for Best Trading Technology Practitioner...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 10th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in NYC explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2019/2020 – Seventh Edition

Welcome to A-Team Group’s best read handbook, the Regulatory Data Handbook, which is now in its seventh edition and continues to grow in terms of the number of regulations covered, the detail of each regulation and the impact that all the rules and regulations will have on data and data management at your institution. This...