About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

RepRisk Chief Hails CSDDD as Good for Investor Decision Making

Subscribe to our newsletter

The European Union’s latest piece of sustainability legislation will provide investors with greater transparency into companies’ climate and human rights performance, giving them crucial information on which to make investment and risk decisions, according to a leading figure in the ESG data space.

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) will enable firms to present information on the key environmental and social risks they face and help investors identify which are a better bet, said Alexandra Mihailescu Cichon, chief commercial officer for RepRisk. The regulation will also go some way to reducing environmental and social harms, Mihailescu Cichon told ESG Insight.

“For us, as a data provider who is focused on due diligence and focused on risks, our whole raison d’etre is to support organisations with due diligence, with better risk management, so we’re excited to see this coming into play in the market,” she said. “It will really shift the dial when it comes to reducing the adverse impacts on the environment and on society.”

Final Text

The CSDDD, the final text of which was approved last week, will require companies to seek information on the climate and human rights implications of what they do and the activities of the suppliers they work with. While financial institutions will only be expected to report on their own performances, non-financial firms will be obliged to seek information and engagement throughout their value chains.

The regulation is expected to work in concert with another EU rule, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which came into force at the start of the year and puts responsibility on more than 50,000 companies to disclose a wealth of ESG data. Together, it’s anticipated that the rules will hold companies accountable for their impacts and help investors build a fuller picture of the firms and assets in which they invest.

Controversy has surrounded the CSDDD after it was altered by drafters following interventions from France, Germany and Italy. They were concerned that the rule would place too many burdens on their companies.

The revised regulation, drawn up by Belgian diplomats, attracted criticism that it had been de-fanged. Research by the Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations (SOMO) suggested that the revised regulation would bring in scope just 5,421 companies, a huge reduction from the 16,389 that had been in the frame when the regulation was passed in December. In particular, the number of German firms included in the scope of the regulation was almost halved.

Resilience Boost

Business groups and environmentalists alike have criticised the changes. Eurochambres, which represents a broad span of European industries, said the regulations would affect the functioning of supply chains and erode members’ competitiveness. The World Wide Fund for Nature, however, said the rules didn’t go far enough.

Mihailescu Cichon said the negotiations that brought the CSDDD to be finally approved were part-and-parcel of the process of bringing change.

“There’s always spirited debate when it comes to regulation and we’re in a pivotal moment in the ESG space, because we’ve had the era of pledges and commitments, which has brought a lot of idealism, which is wonderful, and now we’re pivoting into this era of implementation and when you do that, things can get thorny, things can get complicated,” she said. “All in all, I think it’s a pretty good balance of ambition and pragmatism.”

Professional services giant Deloitte expressed optimism that CSDDD would boost corporate resilience, a point made also by Mihailescu Cichon.

“A company that manages its risk in a comprehensive and forward-looking way will lower its overall risk profile, will lower the financial risks it potentially faces, will lower its reputational risks, and now their own regulatory risk,” she said. “It makes companies in scope a more attractive investment for investors because the company will be able to perform not just today but will continue to be a viable investment over time.”

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to maximise data sources created by MiFID II

Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) creates new data sources that could be used to identify business opportunities and gain competitive edge. The sources include Approved Publication Arrangements (APA) and ESMA’s Financial Instruments Reference Data System (FIRDS). The regulation also mandates use of standard data, disaggregated market data feeds, and ISINs for OTC...

BLOG

A-Team Group Data Management Awards USA Winners Announced at DMS NYC 2025

A-Team Group has announced the winners of its 4th annual Data Management Insight Awards USA 2025, and we extend our congratulations to the individuals and companies recognised with awards this year. The event shines a light on the top providers of data management solutions, services, and consultancy for the capital markets across the United States....

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

Impact of Derivatives on Reference Data Management

They may be complex and burdened with a bad reputation at the moment, but derivatives are here to stay. Although Bank for International Settlements figures indicate that derivatives trading is down for the first time in 10 years, the asset class has been strongly defended by the banking and brokerage community over the last few...