About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Does the European Commission’s “Control Tower” Need a Data Utility Foundation?

Subscribe to our newsletter

This week the European Parliament and Council negotiators have agreed a package of plans to boost the regulatory community’s control of the financial markets, in line with some of the changes going on in the US. One of these has been to plan for the establishment of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) by January next year. But, given its remit to more closely monitor risk across markets in a similar vein to the Office of Financial Research across the pond, will this endeavour involve the establishment of a European-based reference data utility?

The package of reforms passed this week grants new powers to the ESRB and the incoming EU supervisory authorities (ESAs) with a view to enabling these pan-European level bodies to supervise cross border financial institutions in a more joined up manner. They will also be given the authority to police the national regulators themselves by checking they are meeting their obligations required under EU legislation and thus provide a cohesive European financial supervisory framework (thus rectifying the lack of harmonisation when it comes to implementing European directives – see MiFID for a prime example).

A large part of this endeavour will be focused on monitoring systemic risk across the European markets and this is where the ESRB comes into play. European Internal Market Commissioner Michel Barnier reckons the new agencies will act as the “control tower and the radar screens needed to identify risks, the tools to better control financial players and the means to act quickly, in a coordinated way, in a timely fashion”, provided the deal is ratified by the European Parliament next week.

But if it is approved on 7 September, what then? The ESRB has been charged with developing a common set of indicators to permit uniform ratings of the riskiness of specific cross border financial institutions and making it easier to identify the types of risks they carry. It will also be responsible for establishing colour coded grades to reflect different risk levels to be used when making warnings or recommendations about tackling systemic risk. However, in order to be able to function in this manner, surely there is some requirement for uniform data on which to base this analysis?

Although the European Parliament has not yet publically discussed it, a data utility in the vein of the Office of Financial Research may be on the cards. Given that the European political community is keen to keep in line with developments in the US and individuals at the European Central Bank (ECB) have championed the idea, then surely it is time for a serious discussion at a European level on the subject?

Of course, it is very early days yet for the Office of Financial Research in the US (its new head is yet to be appointed for a start) and its success is far from guaranteed. But the practicalities of how to monitor systemic risk across an industry that has a plethora of different and often proprietary entity identifiers is an important point for discussion. Whether the regulatory community opts for a US style utility approach, or a more commercially driven endeavour, the discussion needs to happen publically and soon, if the politicians have a hope of ensuring these new bodies can function effectively when they are established in January.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Potential and pitfalls of large language models and generative AI apps

Large language models (LLMs) and Generative AI applications are a hot topic in financial services, with vendors offering solutions, financial institutions adopting the technologies, and sceptics questioning their outcomes. That said, they are here to stay, and it may be that early adopters of Generative AI apps could gain not only operational benefits, but also...

BLOG

GLEIF Adds Delhi-based MNS Credit Management to LEI Validation Agent Network

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has added MNS Credit Management Group (MNS) as a Validation Agent in the Global LEI System. This brings the number of agents able to obtain and maintain LEIs for their clients to more than 10 worldwide. MNS will work as a Validation Agent for Legal Entity Identifier India,...

EVENT

TradingTech Briefing New York

Our TradingTech Briefing in New York is aimed at senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution, trading architecture and offers a day packed with insight from practitioners and from innovative suppliers happy to share their experiences in dealing with the enterprise challenges facing our marketplace.

GUIDE

Evaluated Pricing

Valuations and pricing teams are facing a much higher degree of scrutiny from both the regulatory community and the investor community in the glare of the post-crisis data transparency spotlight. Fair value price transparency requirements and the gradual move towards a more harmonised accounting standards environment is set within the context of the whole debate...