About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Brits Say HFT Does Not Lead to Volatility

Subscribe to our newsletter

A report published by the U.K. government says that there is no evidence that high frequency trading leads to increased volatility, which is a key driver of market data rates.

The report – The Future of Computer Trading in Financial Markets – by the U.K. government’s Office for Science – which is not a regulator – finds “Economic research thus far provides no direct evidence that high frequency computer based trading has increased volatility.”

The report does however conclude:

“However, in specific circumstances, a key type of mechanism can lead to significant instability in financial markets with computer based trading (CBT): self-reinforcing feedback loops (the effect of a small change looping back on itself and triggering a bigger change, which again loops back and so on) within well-intentioned management and control processes can amplify internal risks and lead to undesired interactions and outcomes.

The feedback loops can involve risk-management systems, and can be driven by changes in market volume or volatility, by market news, and by delays in distributing reference data.

A second cause of instability is social: a process known as normalisation of deviance, where unexpected and risky events come to be seen as ever more normal (e.g. extremely rapid crashes), until a disaster occurs.”

The full report can be downloaded here.

Regulators in several European countries, and the U.S., are investigating HFT and the role it plays in the financial markets, and are considering ways to curb it. At the same time, general conditions in the equities markets has made HFT a less profitable strategy, causing some trading firms to look to introduce it to other asset classes (in less regulated markets).

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Navigating the Build vs Buy Dilemma: Cloud Strategies for Accelerating Quantitative Research

For many quantitative trading firms and asset managers, building a self-provisioned historical market data environment remains one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive steps in establishing a new research capability. Sourcing data, normalising symbologies, handling corporate actions and maintaining infrastructure can take months and absorb significant budget before a single model is tested. At the...

BLOG

Bloomberg Enhances RMS Enterprise to Unlock Proprietary Models and Strengthen Research Oversight

Bloomberg has announced significant enhancements to its enterprise-level Research Management Solution (RMS Enterprise), introducing two new capabilities: Custom Fundamentals and Digest Alerts. The updates are designed to address long-standing data interoperability challenges within investment firms, allowing research teams to better integrate proprietary financial models into their workflows and strengthen oversight across their organisations. For many...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...