About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Being Smart About Being Fast – One Speed Does Not Fit All

Subscribe to our newsletter

As the trading landscape has undergone significant changes over the last several years, financial institutions have developed an insatiable need for low latency. Infrastructures that once had to handle a maximum of 50 trades per second, now must process thousands  – an increase of more than 1,900%. However, aiming to gain the lowest latency possible should not necessarily be your firm’s goal. To succeed in the current environment, you need to have a good understanding of latency within your own infrastructure first and not simply engage in a blind pursuit of ultra-low latency.

Depending on your company’s trading goals, obviously, having the shortest line from point A to point B can be a major advantage.  However, it opens up new, more complex strategies that are not ideal in a high-latency environment and can also slow you down if used incorrectly.

Be an Educated Latency Consumer

In order to find the right latency strategy for your firm, consider the below three points:

1. Be educated – identify your ideas and strategies, outline the execution and the final goal.

2. Don’t be held hostage to the hype – ultra-low latency may be the topic du jour, however, it might not be right for you.

3. Learn to manage speeds – in order to reach optimal solution you need to be able to adapt and be open to exploring all options.

Firstly, you need to map out the latency that is built into every platform and every intermediary system that your orders go through. Once you have a better picture of the route your order takes from entry through execution, you can start to manage your direct market access (DMA), which gives you the ability to mix manual and electronic trading strategies based on your ultimate investment goals.

Remember, no matter what you do, the drive to cut latency is here to stay. With this in mind, you want to make sure that you do not become a hostage to latency and the illusion of unachievably high speeds. Most firms don’t need low latency, they are just position takers that want to say they have it for the sake of having it.

There are some fund managers that pay a lot of money for an ultra-low latency infrastructure, but in reality all they need is relatively good latency. They can get that through one of the intermediaries that come very well equipped and “free” – that is, paid for through their commissions.

There are a lot of misconceptions about low and ultra-low latency – people think that they can beat the speed of light, which is impossible. When you’re situated in the US and routing through Tokyo and Europe, your order takes longer to deliver and you have to factor that into your plan. That means, potentially, putting an office in these regions. But either way, you need to know if you’re trading long-haul, over a significant stretch of network, when you will lose execution speed. Either de-concentrate your trading or integrate what you know about latency into your trading strategy.

Finally, if you have all these elements, it comes down to managing latency properly. This means understanding what you are facing and knowing how to leverage it to your advantage. Don’t try to build from scratch if you can already find a high quality algorithm integrated with latency at the core. Know what everyone is offering and adapt that to your own needs for the ultimate results. When you’re deciding on the latency of your infrastructure, tread carefully. The right solution and answer varies for everyone, there is no one-speed-fits-all solution.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

The Buy-and-Build Line Keeps Moving – And That’s the Point

The old buy-versus-build debate in trading technology has been declared dead so many times it risks becoming a cliché. But at a recent A-Team Group webinar entitled How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach, sponsored by interop.io, a sharper question surfaced beneath the familiar framing: if...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

BCBS 239 Data Management Handbook

Our 2015/2016 edition of the BCBS 239 Data Management Handbook has arrived! Printed copies went like hotcakes at our Data Management Summit in New York but you can download your own copy here and get access to detailed information on the  principles and implications of BCBS 239 on Data Management. This Handbook provides an at-a-glance...