About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A question of semantics

Subscribe to our newsletter

It has been all go on the standards front this month, what with the release of the “industry roadmap”, ongoing discussions on the future of the business entity identifier (BEI) and a veritable cartload of progress updates from the EDM Council.

The buzzword of the moment seems to have quietly become “interoperability”, rather than “convergence”, as under the roadmap plan the three key standards bodies have agreed to work on the transition points between FIX, FpML and ISO standards rather than forcing the industry to move to a whole new messaging standard. In fact, the industry roadmap is a far cry from Swift’s original push in 2001 to get all other standards to fall in line under the banner of ISO 15022 and, as such, it may represent the best chance the industry has at dealing with the messaging nightmare.

FIX Protocol, Swift and ISDA have initially agreed to provide market participants with a visual map of industry standard protocols and highlight the transition, or “peering”, points between them. The driving force behind interoperability is that rather than all standards converging under one roof, each retains its own syntax and format but mapping between these standards is introduced to ensure conversion between them can be performed automatically. The standards bodies are keen to stress that the immediate concern of the group is a reworking of business processes and not a change to the messaging standards themselves.

The cost implications for end users will therefore be minimal. Regardless of these short term assurances, there have been rumblings across the industry about the potential cost of moving to ISO 20022 in the long term, which is the stated end goal of the initiative. Given that adoption of ISO 15022 messaging was such a laborious process and market penetration is nowhere near what was intended, this does seem to be a worry for the future.

Right now, however, the standards bodies seem to be avoiding the question of how any kind of future message convergence will be tackled. Perhaps it will become clearer once these first steps have been accomplished and the industry finally has a workable solution to the current processing nightmare. On the entity identifier front, the roadmap will also involve a common data dictionary and part of this should include the introduction of a BEI. Unfortunately, the introduction of an industry standard BEI remains a long way off, as the ongoing stand off between the IBEI community and the BIC community continues unabated.

Although eight European countries have agreed to adopt the IBEI, the rest of the world is continuing to debate whether the BIC can be adapted for use as a BEI in its stead. BIC users are being accused of holding the industry back and Swift appears to have gone quiet over its proposals for collective investment vehicle identification codes (CIVICs), which it announced at Sibos 07 in Boston. In an attempt to shed light on the matter, the EDM Council has produced a report looking into the reasons behind why the industry is so wary of the BEI. According to the report, although institutions are aware of the benefits of introducing a BEI, they are more concerned about the costs, especially given the current economic climate.

Last year’s credit crisis has raised the profile of some of the other areas of data management however, as A-Team Group and GoldenSource’s recent study into OTC derivatives and data management indicates. Institutions’ increased focus on risk related to complex instruments is driving them to re-evaluate their data management systems and spend more money on IT resources in this area. Perhaps it’s not bad news for everyone then.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to harness the power and potential of ownership data

The importance of ownership data has escalated over the past few years as financial institutions have acknowledged its potential. Key use cases include integrated risk assessment, which uses ownership data to help financial institutions gain a clear understanding of supplier and customer networks, and identify and mitigate risk. Equally significant is the use of ownership...

BLOG

Challenges and Opportunities of Achieving a 360-Degree View of Risk

Achieving a 360-degree view of risk is a challenge, but can be achieved by taking a holistic approach to risk that embeds necessary data within a firm’s corporate structure and makes it accessible to all parts of the enterprise. Integrating data in this way enables all parts of the business to work in unison towards...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 12th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in New York brings together the North American, capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore the evolution of data strategy and how to leverage data to drive compliance and business insight.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook – Third Edition

Need to know all the essentials about the regulations impacting data management? Welcome to the third edition of our A-Team Regulatory Data Handbook which provides all the essentials about regulations impacting data management. A-Team’s series of Regulatory Data Handbooks are a great way to see at-a-glance: All the regulations that are impacting data management today...