About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

A New Age of Automation For Proxy Voting on Horizon?

Subscribe to our newsletter

The similarity of the proxy voting process to the corporate actions process has in some ways negatively impacted efforts to automate proxy voting, but a recently initiated pilot of new Swift proxy voting messages could herald in greater efficiencies to the process.

This was the message from Chad Spitler, principal/associate director, corporate governance and proxy at Barclays Global Investors, speaking during the corporate actions focus day preceding FIMA 2006 earlier this month in London.

The problem has been that because the proxy voting process is similar to the corporate actions process, there have been efforts to fit proxy voting into the corporate actions model, but, said Spitler, “it’s just different enough that it doesn’t fit”. With the increasing emphasis on good corporate governance though there is a definite requirement for automation of a process complicated by the involvement of multiple players with multiple roles, and beset by a lack of common definitions, the absence of an audit trail and a proliferation of proprietary systems.

According to Linda Bookheim, senior business manager, North America, Securities Industry Division at Swift, its new proxy voting messages are designed to replace existing agreed market practice for proxy using ISO 15022 messages. “Due to problems with processing the proxies in back office systems, the market recommended we create a set of messages specifically for proxy,” she says. “We have now done that using the ISO 20022 methodology. With the help of industry practitioners we have created eight XML messages covering the entire proxy business flow.” If the pilot currently under way proves a success, the plan is to make the messages live on Swiftnet in Q4 2007.
BGI is involved in the Swift pilot, working with Euroclear and proxy voting solutions provider ADP Investor Communication Services, and Spitler told FIMA delegates the experience of agreeing the new messages was a broadly positive one, though he did say: “I would have added more data elements, but the custodians wouldn’t have any of that!” He confirmed that BGI would be encouraging all its custodians to sign up and start using the Swift proxy voting messages.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: The Data Office at a Crossroads — AI Governance, Organisational Design, and the Evolving Mandate of the CDO

Date: 28 July 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Who owns AI governance in a capital markets firm – and is the Data Office structured to bear that weight? These questions sit at the heart of A-Team Research’s latest findings, presented here for the first time: the combined...

BLOG

Closing the AI Gap: Why Financial Institutions Must Move Beyond Pilots to Enterprise-Scale Impact

By Ravi Sidhu, UK&I risk and compliance solutions at Dun & Bradstreet. AI enthusiasm across financial services is at an all-time high, but measurable enterprise-wide success remains elusive. While UK businesses are moving quickly in AI readiness, with 52 per cent already using third-party AI platforms or modern cloud-native infrastructure to deploy AI workloads at...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

Now in its 16th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London brings together the European capital markets enterprise data management community, to explore how data strategy is evolving to drive business outcomes and speed to market in changing times.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...