About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Zeptonics Hit By Legal Ruling; Cannot Sell Ultra-Low-Latency Products

Subscribe to our newsletter

Australian financial trading technology vendor Zeptonics has been directed by the Federal Court of Australia to assign the ownership of certain of its products – including its ZeptoLink fanout device and ZeptoMatch matching engine – to proprietary trading firm Zomojo, which claimed ownership of them. It is considering appealing the decision, but for now it cannot sell them or support any companies using or evaluating them.

Zomojo claimed – and the court ruled – that ownership of ZeptoLink, ZeptoMatch (a matching engine), ZeptoNIC (a network interface card) and ZeptoAccess KRX (a trading gateway for the Korean Stock Exchange) resided with itself. As such, Zeptonics is not allowed to sell or support the use of those products. Zeptonics previously announced sales of ZeptoLink and its ZeptoMux switch to a Chicago-based trading firm, and say that “around half of the world’s top ten proprietary trading firms, have been in the process of trialing” its technology.

ZeptoMux – a many-to-one multiplexer with latency of 130 nanoseconds – is not covered by the ruling.

Without getting into all of the background and detail – the court ruling runs to 183 pages – at the heart of the dispute is Zeptonics founder Matthew Hurd, who worked at Zomojo for several years as its co-managing director and head of IT development.

Essentially, Hurd became unhappy working at Zomojo and left the company early in 2011, founding Zeptonics around the same time. Zomojo claims that Zeptonics’ technology is based on that developed by Hurd while he worked for it.

Zeptonics says that it believes it has “substantial grounds for appeal,” but has not determined whether to take that route. For its part, Zomojo does not seem interested in becoming a technology vendor, and is seeking the return of ZeptoLink devices installed at other trading firms.

The moral of the story: considerable due diligence is required when buying technology, especially when it is cutting edge from niche vendors, and likely to provide a real advantage.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

The Matching Engine Was Never the Hard Part: What 24/7 Really Demands of Exchange Architecture

The framing has become familiar. Digital asset exchanges, prediction markets and retail-driven platforms have normalised continuous trading. Traditional venues, with their nightly batch cycles and weekly maintenance windows, are now playing catch-up as they extend hours, tokenise assets and reach for new distribution models. The conventional answer is to point at the matching engine and...

EVENT

Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference, Fall, New York, hosted by A-Team Group

Now in its 8th year, the Eagle Alpha Alternative Data Conference managed by A-Team Group, is the premier content forum and networking event for investment firms and hedge funds.

GUIDE

Alternative Data in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

Alternative data adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. Simply possessing a dataset is no longer a differentiator – the priority now is how data is sourced, synthesised and deployed, and how quickly granular, disaggregated signals can be turned into validated, decision-ready insight. The 2026 edition of the Alternative Data in...