About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Zeptonics Hit By Legal Ruling; Cannot Sell Ultra-Low-Latency Products

Subscribe to our newsletter

Australian financial trading technology vendor Zeptonics has been directed by the Federal Court of Australia to assign the ownership of certain of its products – including its ZeptoLink fanout device and ZeptoMatch matching engine – to proprietary trading firm Zomojo, which claimed ownership of them. It is considering appealing the decision, but for now it cannot sell them or support any companies using or evaluating them.

Zomojo claimed – and the court ruled – that ownership of ZeptoLink, ZeptoMatch (a matching engine), ZeptoNIC (a network interface card) and ZeptoAccess KRX (a trading gateway for the Korean Stock Exchange) resided with itself. As such, Zeptonics is not allowed to sell or support the use of those products. Zeptonics previously announced sales of ZeptoLink and its ZeptoMux switch to a Chicago-based trading firm, and say that “around half of the world’s top ten proprietary trading firms, have been in the process of trialing” its technology.

ZeptoMux – a many-to-one multiplexer with latency of 130 nanoseconds – is not covered by the ruling.

Without getting into all of the background and detail – the court ruling runs to 183 pages – at the heart of the dispute is Zeptonics founder Matthew Hurd, who worked at Zomojo for several years as its co-managing director and head of IT development.

Essentially, Hurd became unhappy working at Zomojo and left the company early in 2011, founding Zeptonics around the same time. Zomojo claims that Zeptonics’ technology is based on that developed by Hurd while he worked for it.

Zeptonics says that it believes it has “substantial grounds for appeal,” but has not determined whether to take that route. For its part, Zomojo does not seem interested in becoming a technology vendor, and is seeking the return of ZeptoLink devices installed at other trading firms.

The moral of the story: considerable due diligence is required when buying technology, especially when it is cutting edge from niche vendors, and likely to provide a real advantage.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Reviewing the Latency Landscape and the Next Generation of Ultra-Low Latency Infrastructure

Ultra-low latency is no longer the preserve of a handful of proprietary trading firms. As new asset classes electronify, data volumes surge, and regulatory expectations around execution quality and resilience tighten, the performance demands on trading infrastructure are broadening across sell-side desks, electronic market makers, and an expanding range of buy-side participants. The technology landscape...

BLOG

Buy or Build? Trade Surveillance Software’s Oldest Question Has New Stakes

By Nolan Schiff, Chief Solutions Officer, Eventus. It’s a question nearly as old as enterprise software itself: should you pay a vendor to deliver your technology, or dedicate internal resources to building and maintaining it yourself? For trade surveillance, it’s a decision that requires weighing cost against control, performance against customization and the speed of...

EVENT

AI in Data Management Summit New York City

Following the success of the 15th Data Management Summit NYC, A-Team Group are excited to announce our new event: AI in Data Management Summit NYC!

GUIDE

Entity Data Management Handbook – Fifth Edition

Welcome to the fifth edition of A-Team Group’s Entity Data Management Handbook, sponsored for the fourth year running by entity data specialist Bureau van Dijk, a Moody’s Analytics Company. The past year has seen a crackdown on corporate responsibility for financial crime – with financial firms facing draconian fines for non-compliance and the very real...