About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

The Model Muddle

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Richard Moss, Product Manager, AxiomSL.

Many financial institutions (FIs) find themselves wondering how they became mired in a credit model muddle that is dragging down their profitability. They want to know how they can get out of this swamp.

Traditionally, FIs heavily relied on economic capital models to support business decision-making. Then, with the financial crisis precipitating a slew of new regulations, FIs were forced to lean away from economic capital models to right-size the capital requirements imposed upon them. Today, the divide between economic and regulatory capital is larger than it has ever been.

In response to regulatory capital requirements, FIs now seek to invest in businesses with lower regulatory capital commitments, clustering their investments into similar businesses that promise to deliver a higher ROE. When many FIs abandon their core strengths to focus on such investments, systemic risk builds, profit margins narrow, and fresh concerns arise as FIs enter somewhat unfamiliar territory.

Consequently, maximising shareholder value has become a direct function of efficiency improvements and optimal resource management. Assessing and perfecting the risk model execution framework is a key part of that objective.

Most large FIs use the internal ratings based (IRB) approach in an effort to optimise capital. However, developing custom-built IRB credit risk models is complex. Hence, many FIs have been forced to invest heavily in the services of third-party consultancy firms that essentially monopolise a niche – developing and maintaining these models.

FIs pay a price. Initial and recurring investments costs are high. But because the model execution process is effectively a black box, they also suffer negative impacts on decision-making due to lack of transparency.

Thus, the model muddle in which many FIs find themselves!

To escape the mire, FIs today can consider a fresh, unconventional approach: building a credit risk model framework using open-source language and integrating it seamlessly with regulatory reporting requirements. This approach provides the FI with in-house control, reduces cost commitments and gives them much needed visibility into the process.

With model ownership transferred to an in-house team, FIs can easily scrutinise techniques and approaches in finer detail, thereby improving governance. With this level of transparency, comes the ability to develop more bespoke, complex, and refined models for myriad, ever changing capital reporting requirements. Building with open-source language means that third-party consultancies become redundant. No longer is there the need to sustain year-on-year licensing costs for their platform, upgrades, or patches.

Credit risk models form the foundation of risk reporting and are the very core of regulatory requirements such as counterparty credit risk (CCR) and IFRS 9. By adopting this innovative, transparent approach, FIs:

  • Reduce total cost of ownership (TCO)
  • Maximise shareholder value
  • Strengthen traceability and governance processes
  • Satisfy regulatory scrutiny through enhanced controls
  • Improve time to market

Further, improved data lineage not only fosters development of valuable, actionable in-house knowledge but also underpins BCBS 239 compliance.

IRB and credit risk models built using open-source language and managed internally provide the missing link that makes it possible to seamlessly create an end-to-end risk reporting process. By adopting this unconventional approach, FIs can leave the model muddle behind.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best approaches for trade and transaction reporting

11 September 2025 10:00am ET | 3:00pm London | 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 Minutes Compliance practitioners and technology leaders in capital markets face mounting pressure to ensure that reporting processes are efficient, accurate, and aligned with global standards. Market developments and jurisdictional nuances in regulatory frameworks like MiFID II, EMIR, SFTR and MAS create a...

BLOG

The Future of Wealth Management: The Rise of Alternatives and Digital Transformation

By Tom Carey, Corporate Vice President, President of Global Technology and Operations at Broadridge. Wealth management stands at a pivotal crossroads, poised for revolutionary change that will fundamentally reshape the delivery, consumption and value of financial services. Global assets under management are projected to reach $145.4 trillion by 2026, with alternative investments growing at twice...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

The AI in Capital Markets Summit will explore current and emerging trends in AI, the potential of Generative AI and LLMs and how AI can be applied for efficiencies and business value across a number of use cases, in the front and back office of financial institutions. The agenda will explore the risks and challenges of adopting AI and the foundational technologies and data management capabilities that underpin successful deployment.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets: Practical Insight for a Transforming Industry – Free Handbook

AI is no longer on the horizon – it’s embedded in the infrastructure of modern capital markets. But separating real impact from inflated promises requires a grounded, practical understanding. The AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2025 provides exactly that. Designed for data-driven professionals across the trade life-cycle, compliance, infrastructure, and strategy, this handbook goes beyond...