About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Summit Survey – Thomson Reuters’ Kelly Explores Technology Drivers, Focus, Buy vs. Build

Subscribe to our newsletter

Delivering the opening keynote for last week’s Low-Latency Summit in NYC, David Kelly, Thomson Reuters’ CTO for Enterprise Solutions, put the audience response system to good use, polling the standing room only crowd on a number of key questions … covering technology drivers and focuses, and also on buy versus build, where the result was a surprise!

And the results were …

Question 1: What is your current primary driver for technology decision making for you or your customers?

Responses: Cost – 18%, Systems performance – 17%, Data/Trading Volumes – 19%, Regulation – 21%, Liquidity Seeking – 24%.

The responses underlined the wide range of factors that firms are grappling with. Cost and performance are perhaps givens, as is coping with volumes, but staying compliant with regulations, and leveraging fragmented marketplaces for trading advantage were the most significant drivers. Bottom line: There’s always something new to worry about!

Question 2: In terms of high velocity, low latency trading, what is your primary technology focus?

Responses: Market Data/Latency – 20%, Execution Latency – 23%, Trading Engine Proximity – 23%, Regulation – 15%, N/A – 19%.

The responses demonstrated the keen interest in high frequency trading strategies among delegates, and taking execution latency and trading engine proximity together, the emphasis on trading speed is still a driver for technology spend.  Bottom line: For this audience it is still faster, faster, faster!

Question 3: To what extent have you or your customers embraced ‘buy’ versus ‘build’?

Responses: No change over past 3 years – 19%, Trending towards buy – 25%, Trending towards build – 27%, No change – 29%.

The responses were a bit of a surprise for Kelly, who sees the world moving more towards a buy versus build model.  But for this audience, with probably a focus on the lowest latency, the norm is DIY, perhaps making use of certain components – e.g. data feeds, messaging – but integrating them with a lot of home-grown applications.  Bottom line: Thomson Reuters got some great market research!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Unlocking value: Harnessing modern data platforms for data integration, advanced investment analytics, visualisation and reporting

Modern data platforms are bringing efficiencies, scalability and powerful new capabilities to institutions and their data pipelines. They are enabling the use of new automation and analytical technologies that are also helping firms to derive more value from their data and reduce costs. Use cases of specific importance to the finance sector, such as data...

BLOG

New Issue IQ and Boltzbit Partner to Slash Bond Issuance Data Processing Time by 74%

New Issue IQ, the solutions vendor dedicated to modernising primary bond markets, has announced a strategic partnership with deeptech AI company Boltzbit, to optimise the processing of new bond deal information. The collaboration reportedly delivers a processing-time improvement of approximately 74% by automating workflows that have traditionally been manual and fragmented. Through this integration, New...

EVENT

TEST Event page 1

Now in its 15th year the TradingTech Summit London brings together the European trading technology capital markets industry and examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

Hosted/Managed Services

The on-site data management model is broken. Resources have been squeezed to breaking point. The industry needs a new operating model if it is truly to do more with less. Can hosted/managed services provide the answer? Can the marketplace really create and maintain a utility-based approach to reference data management? And if so, how can...