The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Reval Poll Shows Most End-User Costs Would Increase to Comply with Dodd-Frank

In a live webinar poll last week hosted by Reval, the premiere Software-as-a-Service provider for financial risk management, 68 percent of non-financial end-users of derivatives said that they do not have a Credit Support Annex (CSA) in place with counterparties to their OTC derivative contracts, indicating potential cost impacts for key compliance requirements expected under the Dodd-Frank Act. CSA’s are legal documents amending each ISDA Swap Master Agreements (ISDA’s).

In addition, despite the potential headaches and costs associated with the requirement for all market participants to have CSA’s to handle margin requirements, 92 percent of non-financial end-users of derivatives polled say they do not expect to decrease their use of the instruments post final rules.

“This validates the importance of OTC derivatives for commercial hedgers of risk as despite the increases in costs coming their way, the need is still there,” says Jiro Okochi, CEO & Co-Founder of Reval, who hosted “Rules, Rules, Rules: Impacts from Derivative Regulation Under Dodd-Frank .” Reval Chief Compliance Officer Patrick Trozzo co-hosted the webinar, which drew over 450 registrants.

“Our webinar was attended by many Fortune 500 companies, so I suspect as you go further downstream in the market, the actual number of companies not having CSA’s would be above 85 percent,” says Okochi. “Most companies will have to negotiate at least 10 ISDA agreements and monitor thresholds and collateral to each of their Swap Dealers. This number could also go up for commodities hedgers as they most likely would have to negotiate new ISDA’s with pushed-out commodities market-making desks from banks.”

Reval’s poll indicated that 41 percent of registrants do not even have ISDA’s in place. “Even for those that have CSA’s and ISDA’s in place with Swap Dealers, all ISDAs would have to be re-negotiated,” Okochi says.

Under the current draft business conduct and margin rules proposed by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the regulatory agency working to implement Dodd-Frank, non-financial end-users would be required to obtain a CSA to describe how their company’s swap transactions would be covered under collateral or margin agreements. In addition to the legal costs of amending each ISDA Master Agreement, companies would “have to have the people, processes and systems in place to monitor these CSA agreements,” says Okochi.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU and UK authorities. It has also changed dramatically following the UK government’s failure to reach equivalence...

BLOG

Opensee Platform Provides Self-Service Big Data Analytics for Business Users

Paris-based ICA, a provider of big data analytics, has rebranded as Opensee, marking its evolution from an innovative capital markets data analytics platform to a market challenger. The company’s offer is to make hundreds of terabytes of structured data accessible to business users easily and quickly through self-service data analytics tools. The company was initially...

EVENT

Data Management Summit USA Virtual

Now in its 11th year, the Data Management Summit USA Virtual explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

FRTB Special Report

FRTB is one of the most sweeping and transformative pieces of regulation to hit the financial markets in the last two decades. With the deadline confirmed as January 2022, this Special Report provides a detailed insight into exactly what the data requirements are for FRTB in its latest (and final) incarnation, and explores what needs to be done in order to meet these needs on a cost-effective and company-wide basis.