The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Reference Data Spending to Continue at Highs for Two Years

Rest assured. The boom years aren’t over yet. Financial institutions will continue their high rate of spending on reference data projects for the next two years as drivers such as operational risk and regulation continue to force firms to clean up their data acts. That’s the conclusion of a new survey from TowerGroup, which said that the majority of firms surveyed reported that they already had funding in place or had budgeted for reference data management projects this year.

The survey suggested that overall per-institution spending on data management projects had declined, though, to $3.1 million last year from a high of $3.5 million in 2002. The marketplace appears to have matured since bursting onto the scene less than five years ago. The TowerGroup report suggests that failed trades have declined to below 10% of all trades, on average, a far cry from the 40% rates reported in some cases back then. The report says that inaccurate or inconsistent reference data and poor data management processes, however, continue to be a significant factor, featuring in almost 60% of the trades that do fail.

The report also points to the growing acceptance of the possibility of outsourcing reference data management, echoing the sentiments of a survey produced for SunGard Data Management Solutions by A-Team Group, publisher of Reference Data Review. That survey – Reference Data Management: Who Should Handle It? – published back in June last year, found that 95% of participating institutions would consider outsourcing at least part of their reference data management process.

The TowerGroup study pointed to the uptake of fully outsourced managed reference data solutions, offered by the likes of SunGard, Accenture and Capco, as evidence of this acceptance. Early adopters, TowerGroup said, have forged such outsourcing deals, instilling a sense of confidence in such solutions among the wider marketplace. It warned, though, that remain many unanswered questions about the details of this model.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Brexit: Reviewing the regulatory landscape and the data management response

With Brexit behind us and the UK establishing its own regulatory regime having failed to reach equivalence with the EU, financial firms face challenges of double reporting, uncertainty about UK regulation, and a potential exodus of top talent. The data management response is not easy and could stretch some firms to the limit as they...

BLOG

IHS Markit Adds Data Dictionary for EDM Platform

IHS Markit has released a data dictionary designed to help business users gain greater visibility of their data. The Data Dictionary has a web-based interface that allows users to see what data is available within their organisation, and a portal that includes data governance metadata covering how the data is defined, where it has come...

EVENT

Virtual Briefing: ESG Data Management – A Strategic Imperative

This briefing will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management & the LEI

Just over a year since the Financial Stability Board handed over leadership and direction of the interim Global Legal Entity Identifier System – or GLEIS – to the Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) of the LEI the entity identifier is being used for reporting under European Market Infrastructure Regulation. This report discusses recent developments in the...