The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Reference Data Spending to Continue at Highs for Two Years

Share article

Rest assured. The boom years aren’t over yet. Financial institutions will continue their high rate of spending on reference data projects for the next two years as drivers such as operational risk and regulation continue to force firms to clean up their data acts. That’s the conclusion of a new survey from TowerGroup, which said that the majority of firms surveyed reported that they already had funding in place or had budgeted for reference data management projects this year.

The survey suggested that overall per-institution spending on data management projects had declined, though, to $3.1 million last year from a high of $3.5 million in 2002. The marketplace appears to have matured since bursting onto the scene less than five years ago. The TowerGroup report suggests that failed trades have declined to below 10% of all trades, on average, a far cry from the 40% rates reported in some cases back then. The report says that inaccurate or inconsistent reference data and poor data management processes, however, continue to be a significant factor, featuring in almost 60% of the trades that do fail.

The report also points to the growing acceptance of the possibility of outsourcing reference data management, echoing the sentiments of a survey produced for SunGard Data Management Solutions by A-Team Group, publisher of Reference Data Review. That survey – Reference Data Management: Who Should Handle It? – published back in June last year, found that 95% of participating institutions would consider outsourcing at least part of their reference data management process.

The TowerGroup study pointed to the uptake of fully outsourced managed reference data solutions, offered by the likes of SunGard, Accenture and Capco, as evidence of this acceptance. Early adopters, TowerGroup said, have forged such outsourcing deals, instilling a sense of confidence in such solutions among the wider marketplace. It warned, though, that remain many unanswered questions about the details of this model.

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Managing the transaction reporting landscape post Brexit: MiFID II, SFTR, EMIR

Date: 16 March 2021 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes The transaction reporting landscape has, for many financial institutions, expanded considerably in size since the end of the UK’s Brexit transition period on 31 December 2020 and the resulting need for double reporting of some transactions to both EU...

BLOG

GLEIF Deploys Workiva Platform, Expands into North America

The GLEIF Foundation partnered with XBRL International and Workiva in June 2020 to publish its annual report in both human and machine-readable Inline XBRL and HTML format, with GLEIF’s LEI embedded into the financial information. It constitutes only the second official business report globally to automatically link the filing entity to its verified LEI reference...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

The Data Management Summit Virtual explores how financial institutions are shifting from defensive to offensive data management strategies, to improve operational efficiency and revenue enhancing opportunities. We’ll be putting the business lens on data and deep diving into the data management capabilities needed to deliver on business outcomes.

GUIDE

Tackling the Data Management Challenges of FATCA

As the July 1, 2014 deadline for compliance with the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act – or FATCA – approaches, financial institutions around the world are working to ensure their data management and operational systems will meet the requirements of the US legislation. This report discusses the requirements of FATCA and how the legislation is...