The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Progress can be made when client firms stand up and speak

Understanding the issues that clients are facing – and how they are going about handling them – gives us real insight into the progress the reference data industry is making. And by identifying trouble spots we can work to make further progress.

This is why gatherings of practitioners can be a very useful exercise. It’s true that some gatherings can be disregarded as feel-good events with little real substance, usually because people are too aware of the competitive pressures to be truly honest. But there are events that manage to move past this and present a true picture of the real issues being faced by those grappling with data problems.

As it was with the Azdex event held a few weeks ago in London during which representatives from Barclays Capital, Citigroup, Credit Suisse First Boston, HBOS, and Standard Bank spoke candidly about their internal missions to manage client entity data.

As you’ll see from our case studies in this issue, CSFB has taken a distributed approach to the responsibility for the quality of its client entity data given the scale of their databases. By contrast, Standard Bank has taken a centralised approach, pulling all data into one central Client Information File with a unified team of data analysts responsible for its maintenance.

Each example has its own merits and drawbacks, which were honestly discussed by the data managers. For example, CSFB has eradicated multiple changes to the same data item across disparate databases – the multiple databases still exist, but a data attribute is changed in one place only and pumped out to the other databases. The difficulty in this approach has been the ongoing identification of the data owners who ‘care’ enough about any given attribute in order to maintain it. Meanwhile, Standard Bank has reduced duplication of data, but found that a much higher quality of data analyst was required than they originally thought.

In both cases a strategic approach was taken and both have the essential senior management support needed to pull off such large-scale projects.

We’re sure that many attendees learned from hearing about their experiences and can apply that knowledge to their own data management initiatives. If only more client firms could be persuaded to share so openly, the reference data industry could really make progress. After all, the issues are for the most part basic, even mundane, issues that are holding back regulatory compliance, operational efficiencies and straight through processing across the industry.

Surely financial institutions should be focusing on their real business of serving their clients, managing investments, product innovation and other valuable aspects rather than the administrative side. By working together and sharing experiences, all firms could move faster towards making the administration layer almost invisible rather than trying to use it to gain a (temporary) competitive edge. We admit this is a somewhat utopian view of the data world. The very people we’re suggesting should stand up and help others learn from their experience to eradicate data problems are the very people that would then have no job if this succeeded. And of course, we at Reference Data Review might have to find another topic to become engrossed in.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Leveraging data lineage to deliver tangible business benefits

Data lineage is central to data quality, accuracy and access. It is also essential to understanding your data and data flows, systems from simple applications to multiple business intelligence solutions, and how people in your organisation are using data. Implemented across the enterprise, data lineage can provide significant business benefits, including new business opportunities, better...

BLOG

GLEIF Calls Global Industries to Join Development of Cryptographically Verifiable LEI

The Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) has set out grand plans to create a digitised LEI service based on a digitally verifiable credential containing the LEI – the vLEI – and able to provide automated identity verification between counterparties. The ambition is for all industry sectors globally, including financial services, to embed new and...

EVENT

TradingTech Summit London

The TradingTech Summit in London brings together European senior-level decision makers in trading technology, electronic execution and trading architecture to discuss how firms can use high performance technologies to optimise trading in the new regulatory environment.

GUIDE

MiFID II handbook, third edition – How compliant are you?

Six months after Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) went live, how compliant is your organisation? If you took a tactical approach to cross the compliance line on January 3, 2018, how are you reviewing and renewing systems to take a more strategic approach and what are the business benefits of doing so?...