About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Poll Results: Operational Risk and Cost Top List of Concerns for RDR Readers

Subscribe to our newsletter

Operational risk and the desire for greater cost savings are the key issues driving financial institutions to invest in their data management infrastructure, according to the latest results of our reader poll. This result is unsurprising really, given the focus on doing ‘more for less’ in the current financial climate.

What is perhaps more surprising is that regulation and compliance are not affecting these projects, despite the recent increase in regulatory scrutiny and predicted increase in compliance spend. Not a single respondent to the Reference Data Review poll highlighted regulation and compliance as a driver for investment in data management. Also out of the spotlight were reputational risk and M&A, each failing to garner any votes as priorities driving data spend.

Operational risk topped the list with 50% of the vote, closely followed by cost savings at 33%. The remaining 17% was attributed to the ‘other’ category, which one can only assume means factors such as improvements to client servicing and the desire to improve data quality.

The obvious reason for this result is that the reduction of operational risk and cost are easier wins when championing the issue of data management within an institution. Senior management’s strict scrutiny of ROI for projects in the current environment means data management projects must provide tangible metrics such as cost savings to get the green light.

The reduction in headcount over the last six months across institutions also means that they have to find alternatives to people to throw at the problem and automation and data centralisation are apparent solutions.

The results of the poll confirm that risk is very much a concern in the market, as noted by a number of recent research reports into the area of data management. But it is surprising that regulation is not a key concern, despite the high profile that regulators are maintaining at the moment. Perhaps the results will tell a different story in six months’ time, once the regulatory ball gets rolling and the market is faced with the prospect of coping with increasingly strict oversight policies.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Post-Trade Transformation: Automating Clearing & Settlement

Date: 1 December 2026 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes The UK, EU and Swiss markets move to T+1 settlement on 11 October 2027, but the first binding compression arrives almost a year earlier. ESMA’s amended settlement discipline RTS expects allocation and confirmation completed by 23:00 CET on trade...

BLOG

spektr 3.0 Puts Policies and Deterministic Controls Around Compliance AI Agents

Copenhagen based spektr has added real-time transaction monitoring, policy management and AI-assisted investigations to its Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business (KYB) platform. spektr 3.0 converts written policies into operational rules, monitors customer activity against them and uses Case AI to gather evidence and recommend an outcome for analyst approval. Transaction Monitoring checks...

EVENT

Data Management Summit New York City

Now in its 16th year, Data Management Summit (DMS) NYC returns on September 17th 2026, to explore how to use data and AI to drive measurable business outcomes – reliably, repeatedly and at scale.

GUIDE

Alternative Data in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

Alternative data adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. Simply possessing a dataset is no longer a differentiator – the priority now is how data is sourced, synthesised and deployed, and how quickly granular, disaggregated signals can be turned into validated, decision-ready insight. The 2026 edition of the Alternative Data in...