The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Opinion – BCBS 239 Compliance: Slip Slidin’ Away?

By Jennifer L. Costley, Ph.D., Principal, Ashokan Advisors

“Slip slidin’ away
Slip slidin’ away
You know the nearer your destination
The more you’re slip slidin’ away…”

– Paul Simon

A couple of weeks ago, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued their second annual progress report on the adoption of the Committee’s Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting (BCBS 239). Published in 2013, the Principles aim to strengthen risk data aggregation and risk reporting at banks to improve their risk management practices and decision-making processes. The 31 firms designated as global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) are required to implement the Principles in full by 2016.

The report reviews banks’ progress in 2014 and updates a 2013 self-assessment survey completed by G-SIBs, other large banks and their supervisors. The revised survey was shortened from the 2013 version, focusing on the issues considered as “essential and/or critical for compliance purposes” and those where self-reported performance was weak in in 2013.

Even filtered through the objective, analytical writing found throughout the report, the news is not good. The headline: Of the 31 participating banks, 14 reported that they will be unable to fully comply with the Principles by the 2016 deadline, compared with 10 G-SIBs in 2013. BCBS reached several key conclusions based on the survey:

– Overall, there were only minor improvements in average ratings.

– Many banks continue to struggle with the establishment of strong data aggregation governance, architecture and processes and in addition “fail to recognize that governance/infrastructure Principles are important prerequisites for facilitating compliance with other Principles.”

– Many banks actually downgraded their scores in governance (P1), infrastructure (P2) and risk data aggregation (P3-P6), citing factors such as project delays, project complexity, and “scope creep” once the full impact of the regulation was understood.

The report provides details on the results for each of the 11 Principles, including challenges and potential strategies for compliance, well worth reviewing.

It is clear from the document that BCBS is concerned about both the reported slippage against the January 2016 deadline and the significant likelihood that things may get worse: “Regarding the compliance date, the results of the 2014 questionnaire raise some concerns that banks intending to comply by the January 2016 deadline may be overly ambitious… it would appear that a number of firms will find it difficult to fully comply with the Principles by 2016, judging from a review of the work that remains to be done.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Entity identification and client lifecycle management – How financial institutions can drive $4 billion in cost savings

A new model in Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) issuance has created significant opportunities for financial institutions to capitalise on their KYC and AML due diligence. By becoming Validation Agents and obtaining LEIs on behalf of their clients, financial institutions can enhance their client onboarding experience, streamline their internal operations, and open the door to new,...

BLOG

Tableau Supports Capital Markets Participants’ Priorities, Adds Business Science

Tableau, a provider of business intelligence and analytics software, is working with capital markets participants to achieve priorities of driving customer growth, ensuring regulatory compliance, using data analytics for business insight, and identifying operational efficiencies. Most recently, it has added business science to its capabilities, democratising data science and providing business users and analysts with...

EVENT

LIVE Briefing: ESG Data Management – A Strategic Imperative

This breakfast briefing will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

RegTech Suppliers Guide 2020/2021

Welcome to the second edition of A-Team Group’s RegTech Suppliers Guide, an essential aid for financial institutions sourcing innovative solutions to improve their regulatory response, and a showcase for encumbent and new RegTech vendors with offerings designed to match market demand. Available free of charge and based on an industry-wide survey, the guide provides a...