The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Only 12% of Buy Side Firms Ready for Data Requirements of Incoming Regulation, According to MoneyMate Survey

Subscribe to our newsletter

The buy side has a long way to go before it is ready for the regulatory onslaught it is facing over the next few years in terms of making its data management preparations, if recent figures from a MoneyMate survey of around 50 investment managers are to be believed. Only 12% of respondents indicated that their existing data management processes were fully supportable, automated and left a full statement of record to facilitate audit, and hence would not need significant altering to meet incoming requirements.

The majority of respondents, two thirds of who were from the US and the remaining third from Europe, said they have some work yet to do in order to comply. The range of outstanding projects ranged right from a complete overhaul of the processes around product data management (at 23%) to a few key amendments to existing processes for product data (at 56%). The remaining 9% were unsure about what needed to be done in order to keep out of the regulators’ bad books in this regard.

This supports the notion that many buy side firms have examined where they are currently with regards to compliance with data related issues but have not taken much action, as noted by MoneyMate back in July last year. At the time, the vendor’s chief technology officer Ronan Brennan said increased media attention being given to regulation and the punitive action taken by regulators as a result of data errors has flagged the issue of data management for the buy side at large.

In terms of confidence in product data quality, the majority, at 68%, said that this data was “usually” accurate and timely, with only 24% indicating that they were fully confident in it “always” being accurate. This highlights the potential issue that data quality may pose further down the line, given the regulators’ increased focus on accuracy and timeliness.

A whole host of recent regulatory papers, including the MiFID Review, UCITS IV, Basel III, Solvency II or any number of UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) papers contain references to accuracy, consistency, timeliness, reliability and completeness of data. The respondents to MoneyMate’s survey, however, indicated that they were largely preoccupied with the developments around the Dodd Frank Act in terms of data quality (at around 70%). This is no surprise, given that the majority of respondents hailed from the US and the regulatory community in the country has made much of data standardisation over the last 12 months.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has been particularly active in raising the data issue and the Office of Financial Research (OFR) has prompted a global debate about legal entity IDs. The European buy side firms, on the other hand, highlighted UCITS IV and the key investor information document (KID) requirements as the most pressing in terms of data quality, with over 60% of respondents citing these requirements.

Nearly 30% of respondents indicated the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), and an additional 17% indicated Newcits were items of discussion and concern in their firm, which Brennan reckons is a clear indication that alterative strategies and the hedge fund industry are key industry focus points in the years ahead. The biggest challenge that lies ahead for over half (53%) of these firms, according to responses, is moving away from manual processes. Timeliness (at just under 50%) is the next on the hit list, closely followed by cost and accuracy of data; with data audit trail bringing up the rear. However, around 79% consider themselves to be “somewhat prepared” for regulatory change.

It seems that these firms equate being forewarned of change with being forearmed. Of course, vendors such as MoneyMate and the like are touting their services to fill these gaps. If only 12% of buy side firms are fully ready for change, there should be plenty of business to go round.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Managing culture and conduct: Is your organisation compliant with the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR)?

The FCA’s Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR) came into play in the UK banking sector in early 2016, with the aim of reducing harm to consumers and strengthening market integrity by creating a system that enables firms and regulators to hold individuals to account – and it is not going away with the FCA...

BLOG

Australia’s Identitii Launches SaaS-Based AML/CTF Platform to Reduce Regulatory Risk

Australia-based Identitii, which specialises in helping regulated entities including banks and other ‘money services’ providers manage regulatory risk, has launched a SaaS-based reporting and compliance platform aimed at addressing AML and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) reporting obligations. The cloud-based platform delivers end-to-end reporting automation and future proofs compliance by accepting any payment file format used today...

EVENT

Virtual Data Management Summit London (Redirected)

Now in its 8th year, the Data Management Summit (DMS) in London explores the shift to the new world where data is redefining the operating model and firms are seeking to unlock value via data transformation projects for enterprise gain and competitive edge.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2021/2022 – Ninth Edition

Welcome to the ninth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook, a publication dedicated to helping you gain a full understanding of regulations related to your organisation from the details of requirements to best practice implementation. This edition of the handbook includes a focus on regulations being rolled out to bring order and standardisation to...