A-Team Insight Blogs

MiFID II Transaction Reporting Requirements Posing Big Problem for Investment Firms

Over 1,000 investment firms identified problems with their MiFID II transaction reporting requirements in 2018, according to regulatory consultancy Bovill – raising questions around how well the industry is really adapting to the complexities of the new regime.

A Freedom of Information request found that a total of 1,335 notifications of inaccurate transaction reporting were submitted to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the first 12 months of MiFID II (which came into force on January 1, 2018) as firms struggle to get to grips with the new requirements.

The figure represents around a quarter of the 6,000 MiFID II compliant UK businesses, and Bovill Managing Consultant Damon Batten notes that it could in fact represent a significant undercount, as the data only includes businesses which self-identified errors. Under the EU directive, investment firms and trading venues are required to notify the FCA promptly if they identify any errors or omissions within their transaction reports. However, Bovill research warns that “many thousands more firms” are likely submitting inaccurate reports, but are failing to catch them or to inform the regulator.

“Even MiFID II-ready firms are struggling to submit correct reports, while many are still not ready, and some mistakenly believe they’re ready despite almost certainly making reporting errors,” says Batten.

So far, the FCA has not yet enforced the regulation with any degree of aggression, and has indicated that it is prepared to give firms time to settle in and adapt to the new regulation. However, its approach has raised ire within the industry, with prominent figures such as SCM Direct Co-Founders Alan and Gina Miller citing “a complete breakdown in the FCA regulatory enforcement action,” and threatening legal action against the regulator for failing to penalise investment managers that are breaking the rules.

Yet there are signs that the FCA’s patience is running out. On March 27, the regulator fined Goldman Sachs over £34 million for failing to properly report more than 220 million transactions. The previous week, UBS was fined £227.6 million over 135.8 erroneous transaction reports made between November 2007 and May 2017.

“With the FCA handing big fines for reporting failings to companies like UBS and Goldman Sachs, it’s time firms paid closer attention,” warns Batten. “The FCA’s goodwill will be thin for firms still unable to catch breaches by MiFID II’s second birthday.”

One Reply to “MiFID II Transaction Reporting Requirements Posing Big Problem for Investment Firms”

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Share article

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: MiFID II: Data for transparency

Don’t miss this opportunity to view the recording of this recently held webinar. Markets in Financial Instruments II (MiFID II) makes sweeping changes to pre- and post-trade transparency, extending MiFID requirements limited to equities trades on regulated platforms to cover equity-like and non-equity instruments traded on any trading venue. It also requires trade data to...

BLOG

US Government Sends Final OTC Derivatives Regulations Proposals to Congress

Following the publication of its white paper on an overhaul of the OTC derivatives regulatory regime last month, the US government has finally sent its proposals to Congress, which will vote on them once it returns from its August recess. The proposals include requirements for the more vanilla end of the spectrum of these instruments...

GUIDE

The Data Management Implications of Solvency II

Bombarded by a barrage of incoming regulations, data managers in Europe are looking for the ‘golden copy’ of regulatory requirements: the compliance solution that will give them most bang for the buck in meeting the demands of the rest of the regulations they are faced with. Solvency II may come close as this ‘golden regulation’:...