The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Let’s Focus on Inter-Party Latency

Latency – and keeping it low – remains a concern for the financial markets. We at A-Team know, because our latest poll at found that 80% of respondents reckoned it will be more of a concern in the future. With all this algo and high frequency trading going on, events in the world would seem to back up what people told us. That said, 15% said that latency would be less of a concern in the future. Perhaps those people are from the old guard exchanges, like London and NYSE, who have latency improvement plans in place.

Our new poll (see the poll section on the middle right of the new home page) is about the subject of inter-party latency: “How important is measuring inter-party latency to your firm?” we ask. Judging by the interest in a new standards initiative focused on it, I would expect the poll to declare that it is very important.

Just to recap: Inter-party latency is about measuring the latency that occurs between trading partners – for example, between a sell-side firm and an exchange. Assuming the numbers are good, those parties want to publish this information – it makes an exchange look good to show how fast they are matching orders, and makes a sell-side firm likewise when it can demonstrate that its DMA architecture is the best. And of course, the customers of those participants want to know the results, good or bad.

Latency monitoring firms like Corvil, Correlix and TS-Associates have offerings in this space, and most would suggest that Corvil is in a leading position, at least on paper, since its appliances are deployed widely at name-brand participants, like Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, BT, Thomson Reuters, Fixnetix, the CME Group and Deutsche Borse.

Now, inherent is making inter-party latency work is that the monitoring appliances at both ends (e.g. the sell-side firm and the exchange) need to be able to communicate and understand one another. Which is fine if both ends have Corvil, or Correlix, or TS-A. But what if both have different vendor appliances? Right now, that’s a show stopper. But does it have to be this way?

Clearly, the members of the FIX Protocol Organization Inter-Party Latency (FIPL) Working Group think not. This new group – it was formed only in December – already has 145 members, which makes it one of the largest. All of the latency monitoring vendors are members, as well as a good few trading firms, and vendors of trading applications.

The working group has already had one telephone meeting, and early tasks are to define some standard terminology and create a flow-chart of the trade life-cycle, so that all the members are speaking the same language – in the hopes that any standard they devise will as well.

So it’s very early days and it’s yet to be seen whether this group will hash out something workable, and how long it will take. And then it will be up for vendors to implement it if they so chose, which may well depend on how much real user pressure there is for it. Maybe the latest poll will provide an indication of that.

Related content


Recorded Webinar: Adverse media screening – how to cut exposure to criminal activity, from money laundering to human trafficking

Screening for adverse media coverage of counterparties presents an incredible opportunity for financial institutions to limit risk exposures and identify bad actors early. It is required by regulations such as the EU’s sixth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AML 6), and is one of the most effective ways to steer clear of potential connections with sanctioned activity...


SmartTrade Expands Partnership with Japan’s SBI as Demand for Crypto Solutions Grows

Multi-asset electronic trading solutions provider smartTrade Technologies is expanding its partnership with SBI Liquidity Market, a Japanese FX infrastructure solution and liquidity provider, to provide support for SBI FXTrade’s cryptocurrency derivative trading operations, which will complement the existing FX business of SBI Liquidity Market. SmartTrade is seeing increasing demand for its cryptocurrency & digital asset...


TradingTech Summit Virtual (Redirected)

TradingTech Summit (TTS) Virtual will look at how trading technology operations can capitalise on recent disruption and leverage technology to find efficiencies in the new normal environment. The crisis has highlighted that the future is digital and cloud based, and the ability to innovate faster and at scale has become critical. As we move into recovery and ‘business as usual’, what changes and technology innovations should the industry adopt to simplify operations and to support speed, agility and flexibility in trading operations.


Trading Regulations Handbook 2021

In these unprecedented times, a carefully crafted trading infrastructure is crucial for capital markets participants. Yet, the impact of trading regulations on infrastructure can be difficult to manage. The Trading Regulations Handbook 2021 can help. It provides all the essentials you need to know about regulations impacting trading operations, data and technology. A-Team Group’s Trading...