The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

ING Investment Management Has Banned the Term ‘Golden Copy’, Says Murphy

Share article

Proving that for some institutions the approach to data management is changing dramatically, Nick Murphy, data specialist for pricing and evaluations at ING Investment Management, told delegates to last week’s FIMA that his own firm has banned the term “golden copy” from use. The focus is on maintaining centralised and standardised data for instruments, but it is also about meeting the requirements of the internal business users, he said.

The number one priority for data management is to get recognition of the fact that reference data is an asset to an organisation, said Murphy, reprising a theme that many other speakers elaborated upon at this year’s FIMA. It is often undervalued by the business and quality is frequently sacrificed to lower costs, he said.

Other priorities at the moment include coping with the globalisation and standardisation of data by tackling the issue of data governance (a point also raised by fellow buy side representative from UBS Ian Webster) and the continual challenge of dealing with a siloed environment. In order to help it deal with this environment, the firm is currently implementing a new data management solution from Cadis for its static and market data, which Murphy hopes will allow it to better judge data completeness and accuracy.

“Everywhere I have worked I have seen the difficulties caused by letting end users change or create classifications downstream,” he said. “Changing data fields and attributes at the individual business level causes a lot of complexity down the line.” By having a centralised structure to monitor data quality across the institution, Murphy anticipates that some of these problems can be picked up more easily.

Firms also need to draw up quality indicators on data to check whether their requirements are being met by vendor systems and internally built solutions, he suggested. To this end, Murphy is keen to draw up internal client service level agreements (SLAs) in order to ensure data quality is being maintained.

Murphy noted that vendors have been slow to properly service the needs of the buy side, however, many firms are also unsure about the requirements of their own internal end users. “The industry has to be brave but cautious about what we opt to do with vendors in a managed services environment, for example,” he said. “You don’t want to give away control over your data quality.”

So, vendors may have their faults, but they can be useful partners in bringing technology expertise to the table, according to Murphy. “Don’t bash your vendors too much,” he joked. “They are people too.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to leverage the LIBOR transition to improve your data management game

The transition away from LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) is well underway, but there remains considerable ambiguity around how the final stages will be executed – especially with regards to benchmark replacements in markets outside the UK. What are the options, where are the uncertainties and what stage have firms reached in their preparations? The...

BLOG

Ones and Zeros: How Asset Managers Can be Digital Transformation Heroes

By Phil Davies, CTO of Milestone Group. The pace of digital transformation in asset management has been referred to as glacial. However, this new decade comes at an inflection point – over the past couple of years, the discussion has picked up considerably with firms finally embracing the digital ecosystem. People have built up both confidence...

EVENT

RegTech Summit Virtual

Regtech Summit Virtual will explore how business and operating models have adapted post COVID and how RegTech can provide agile and enhanced compliance for managing an evolving risk and compliance landscape. As the dust settles, we will look at the outlook for the global RegTech industry, where Regulators are focusing as they get back to business, and deep dive into global regulatory priorities for the rest of the year and into 2021.

GUIDE

Valuations – Toward On-Demand Evaluated Pricing

Risk and regulatory imperatives are demanding access to the latest portfolio information, placing new pressures on the pricing and valuation function. And the front office increasingly wants up-to-date valuations of hard-to-price securities. These developments are driving a push toward on-demand evaluated pricing capabilities, with pricing teams seeking to provide access to valuations at higher frequency...