The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

IMS Responds to Government’s Money Laundering Consultation

The IMS Group (IMS), the compliance and regulation consultant, has today responded to the Government’s consultation on reviewing Money Laundering Regulations 2007. The consultation period closes on 30 August 2011.

The Government’s proposals are intended to give businesses greater confidence to focus compliance on their highest risk areas and to discourage the tick-box approach taken by some businesses.

Peter Moore, head of regulation & compliance at IMS, says: “One aspect of the review looks at de-criminalising procedural failings. Currently there are criminal sanctions for those who do not have the appropriate systems and controls to combat money laundering. However, offences have not been widely prosecuted. We believe that the legal and regulatory requirements that empower and encourage firms to achieve a prescribed objective, rather than make them fearful of not doing so, are more likely to succeed. We therefore support proposals to decriminalise certain criminal offences in the Money Laundering Regulations.

“It was a shame to see that the Consultation did not cover staff training. Many firms engage with service providers for anti-money laundering training, with much being a computer-based approach. This periodic anti-money laundering technique can, on occasions, represent tick-box compliance at its worse, making it ineffective. We hope to see this addressed going forward.

“Much has been made in the Consultation of the perceived failure of firms relying on checks performed by other firms. It stresses that these provisions are there to simplify the obligations on the customer and firms party to a transaction. This should be reconciled with the FSA’s approach who, in addition, advocates that firms employ sample testing on other firms. We encourage HM Treasury to engage with the FSA to clarify this point.

“Regulatory responsibility will always fall back to an individual firm, whether or not they have relied on another regulated firm. Therefore, it is in that firm’s interests to perform customer due diligence themselves rather than rely on the assurance of another firm. We believe that a true risk-based approach should allow a firm to determine what risk is faced by reliance on another firm.”

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Best practice approaches for corporate actions automation

Date: 18 November 2021 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Demand for timely and accurate corporate actions data is growing as volumes and complexity rise, and financial institutions acknowledge the increasingly costly gap between accurate corporate actions processing in real, or near-real, time and faulty processing caused by poor...

BLOG

SIX Fintech Ventures Leads $8 Million Funding for Crypto RegTech Coinfirm

SIX Fintech Ventures, the corporate venture arm of Swiss exchange operator and data vendor SIX, has co-led an $8 million Series A funding round for Coinfirm, which operates a blockchain-based AML Platform for crypto assets designed to protect against ransomware hacks, human trafficking, sanctions evasion and terrorist financing by risk scoring entities, addresses and transactions. As part of the...

EVENT

RegTech Summit New York City

Now in its 5th year, the RegTech Summit in NYC explores how the North American financial services industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

ESG Handbook 2021

A-Team Group’s ESG Handbook 2021 is a ‘must read’ for all capital markets participants, data vendors and solutions providers involved in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) investing and product development. It includes extensive coverage of all elements of ESG, from an initial definition and why ESG is important, to existing and emerging regulations, data challenges...