The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

IMA Highlights Danger of Systemic Risk Data Overload in AIFMD Response

In its response to the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (ESMA) consultation on the Alternative Investment Fund Management Directive (AIFMD), the UK’s Investment Management Association (IMA) highlights the danger of overloading regulators with too much data for the purposes of systemic risk monitoring. IMA director Julie Patterson indicates that under the directive as it currently stands, regulators risk being buried under mountains of “superfluous data, which could lead to a build up of system risk being overlooked.”

Patterson says that rather than asking for such a wide ranging list of data items from firms in their reporting under AIFMD, ESMA should instead consider that “it is important that information is focused so we can readily identify and monitor potential causes of systemic risk.” Asking for the right data items is therefore key to this endeavour.

The IMA response to this particular buy side focused piece of regulation therefore has some similarities to the criticisms levelled at the Office of Financial Research (OFR) and the Dodd Frank Act by the International Securities Market Advisory Group (ISMAG) and Stephen Daffron, Morgan Stanley’s global head of operations, technology and data. Daffron spoke out about the subject during Sifma’s Operations and Technology Committee meeting in May and noted that the current state of the financial services industry’s raw data is not conducive to being fed into an analytics engine in order to track granular data such as parent/child hierarchies. He indicated three main points of concern: the sheer volume of unstructured data out there; the lack of consistency (of data itself and the OFR’s approach to that data); and the OFR’s intended approach to the challenge overall.

Back in September last year, John Gubert, chairman of ISMAG also noted that regulators would have difficulty sifting through and making sense of the data they are asking firms to provide for risk monitoring purposes. Indeed, he warned that it could result in death by data drowning.

Author and epistemologist Nassim Nicholas Taleb took the argument much further back in July, during a government organised conference on the subject of the OFR . Taleb, who is most famous for his book on unpredictability The Black Swan, suggested that relying on what he calls “sterile data” to monitor systemic risk could engender a false sense of security and is not therefore a worthwhile endeavour at which to throw government money.

Although Taleb’s comments are on the extreme side, serious concerns have therefore been raised about the capacity of the US OFR and other regulators to be able to effectively process and number crunch the high volumes of reference and economic data that they will receive from the industry in order to monitor systemic risk.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How Financial Institutions can adjust to working in the New Normal

The very sudden impact of Covid-19 and resultant shutdown of physical sites has stress-tested financial institutions and vendors to their limits. Now banks and firms are slowly starting to re-open offices. But what will the new normal look like and what steps should you be taking now to make the most of this situation? This...

BLOG

ACA Compliance Group Launches New Global ESG Practice

ACA Compliance Group (ACA) today launched a specialist global environmental, social, and governance (ESG) advisory practice, headed up by Dan Mistler, who joins ACA from ESG and environment firm, Bridge House Advisors. Sustainability and responsible investing increasingly appear on the agendas of global political leaders, regulators, and firms alike. According to President-elect Joe Biden, the U.S. will...

EVENT

Data Management Summit London

The Data Management Summit Virtual explores how financial institutions are shifting from defensive to offensive data management strategies, to improve operational efficiency and revenue enhancing opportunities. We’ll be putting the business lens on data and deep diving into the data management capabilities needed to deliver on business outcomes.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2020/2021 – Eighth Edition

This eighth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook is a ‘must-have’ for capital markets participants during this period of unprecedented change. Available free of charge, it profiles every regulation that impacts capital markets data management practices giving you: A detailed overview of each regulation with key dates, data and data management implications, links to...