About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

HKEX Pulls Out of Bid for LSE

Subscribe to our newsletter

Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing (HKEX) has dropped its $37 billion bid for the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) because it has been unable to engage with LSEG management to realise the deal. While the frustration of HKEX is palpable in its withdrawal statement, there will no doubt be sighs of relief at LSEG as it continues its acquisition of Refinitiv.

In a statement this morning, HKEX said: “The board of HKEX continues to believe that a combination of LSEG and HKEX is strategically compelling and would create a world-leading market infrastructure group. Despite engagement with a broad set of regulators and extensive shareholder engagement, the board of HKEX is disappointed that it has been unable to engage with the management of LSEG in realising this vision, and as a consequence has decided it is not in the best interests of HKEX shareholders to pursue this proposal.”

HKEX made an unexpected bid for LSEG in early September, stipulating that the exchange must revoke its plan to acquire Refinitiv for the deal to go ahead. HKEX envisaged that bringing HKEX and LSEG together would ‘redefine global capital markets for decades to come.’

LSEG was less enthusiastic, unanimously rejecting the bid and saying it saw no merit in further engagement. In a letter to the HKEX, it said the bid ‘fell substantially short of an appropriate valuation for a takeover of LSEG, especially when compared to the significant value we expect to create through our planned acquisition of Refinitiv’.

HKEX had until today to follow up on its initial proposal with a firm bid. Under UK regulation, HKEX it is not allowed to make another approach to the LSE for six months.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: How to move to a modern, component based trading architecture using a Buy AND Build approach

To remain competitive in today’s electronic markets, firms need trading architectures that support rapid innovation, effortless integration of new capabilities, and the agility to respond to shifting market demands. This is prompting technology leaders to move beyond the traditional “Buy vs. Build” debate, a false dichotomy that oversimplifies the choice between generic, off-the-shelf platforms and...

BLOG

Build, Buy, or Both? Why the Real Question for Quant Infrastructure Has Shifted to Where the Edge Sits

The questions have become perennial: build versus buy, cloud versus on-premise, in-house versus managed platform. But the discussion that emerged from a recent A-Team Group webinar on quantitative research infrastructure pointed to something more interesting than a binary choice. The build-versus-buy question, panellists agreed, has matured into a more sophisticated conversation about where firms locate...

EVENT

AI in Capital Markets Summit London

Now in its 3rd year, the AI in Capital Markets Summit returns with a focus on the practicalities of onboarding AI enterprise wide for business value creation. Whilst AI offers huge potential to revolutionise capital markets operations many are struggling to move beyond pilot phase to generate substantial value from AI.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...