A-Team Insight Blogs

GLEIF CEO Stephan Wolf Outlines LEI Strategy Based on Hindsight and Innovation

The Global LEI Foundation (GLEIF) has set strategy that will make the Legal Entity Identifier not only essential to smooth running of capital markets, but also the wider digital economy. Achieving these goals is a matter of hindsight and innovation based on the GLEIF’s decision to drive extended use of the LEI in the private sector, rather than through regulatory mandates.

Recent initiatives along the way include validation agents that can cut the cost and ease the process of registering for an LEI, and verifiable LEIs (vLEIs) that could provide automated identity verification between counterparties. Stephan Wolf, CEO at the GLEIF, recently shared his thoughts on how the LEI has developed since its introduction back in 2013 and his vision for its future with Data Management Insight.

Looking back, Wolf describes the first five-year strategy for the LEI as building the GLEIF and managing its structure, a task interrupted towards the end of the period by the implementation of MiFID II and MifIR and an escalation in regulatory demand for LEIs. “In 2018, we had two choices, to wait for more regulations mandating use of the LEI and manage the GLEIF as the operational arm of the LEI Regulatory Oversight Committee (ROC) as initially planned, or do more. We had the appetite to do more and moved forward to look at voluntary adoption of the LEI by private sectors. We needed to do this, as well as work with regulatory mandates.”

Market resistance to the LEI

The next five-year strategy was based on this expansion, but first asked why there was market resistance to the LEI. It had support, but implementation was slow. Wolf cites three reasons:

  • Cost, firms didn’t like the $50 to $70 fee for each LEI and were reluctant to adopt the identifier, although the cost has come down in the past couple of years. The cost of projects around the LEI such as linking it into a database was also a problem.
  • The fact that while banks were mandated to use the identifier for reporting, counterparties did not need to implement the LEI leaving cost with the banks.
  • Most importantly, purpose.

In hindsight, Wolf says: “Why would a a firm want to register for an LEI if it had no application for it? The problem from day one was the need to show a purpose for the LEI and a bottom line result.”

Resolving problems and setting goals

The problems of LEI cost and adoption are being addressed by banks operating as validation agents – to date JP Morgan has signed up – which could move the LEI towards mass adoption while reducing costs. The GLEIF is also considering whether business registries, such as Companies House in the UK, could work with validation agents to issue LEIs.

“The aim is to foster growth and take out cost,” Wolf says. Large investments to implement ‘a dumb number’ need not be made either, he adds, referencing mapping services such as BIC-to-LEI and ISIN-to-LEI.

On a broader scale, he talks about digitisation of the economy. “Until recently, companies have ringfenced their systems and built everything themselves. In future, they will need to cooperate with others, such as providers of services and goods. There will be a distributed logistical supply chain driven by the Internet of Things and Industry 4.0, and it will need strong authentication.

“Firms that want to participate in the digital economy will need authentication. They can participate using the LEI and vLEI. In capital markets, we would need a network of vLEI issuers, which could be the same as LEI issuers.”

These are early days for both validation agents and the vLEI. While the concept of a validation agent has been stood up at JP Morgan, the GLEIF plans to issue vLEIs later this year. It doesn’t know how many, but wants to be ready for market demand. “If validation agents and vLEIs roll out at the same time, from 2022 there will be a high adoption rate of LEIs,” concludes Wolf.

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: Maximising success when migrating big data and analytics to cloud

Migrating big data and analytics workflows to the cloud promises significant cost savings through efficient use of infrastructure resources and software that scales dynamically based on data volume, query load, or both. These are valuable gains for investment banks, but they can only be fully realised by taking a new approach to architecture and software...

BLOG

CUSIP Calls on Financial Institutions to Get More Involved in Data Standards Development

CUSIP Global Services is working in partnership to accelerate data standards development in emerging markets including digital securities and ESG investing. The standards organisation is also working with the ANNA Service Bureau to improve coverage and quality of ISINs, and with regulators and the Derivatives Service Bureau on the introduction of the UPI later this...

EVENT

ESG Data & Tech Summit 2022

This summit will explore challenges around assembling and evaluating ESG data for reporting and the impact of regulatory measures and industry collaboration on transparency and standardisation efforts. Expert speakers will address how the evolving market infrastructure is developing and the role of new technologies and alternative data in improving insight and filling data gaps.

GUIDE

Entity Data Management Handbook – Seventh Edition

Sourcing entity data and ensuring efficient and effective entity data management is a challenge for many financial institutions as volumes of data rise, more regulations require entity data in reporting, and the fight again financial crime is escalated by bad actors using increasingly sophisticated techniques to attack processes and systems. That said, based on best...