The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry
The leading knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Giving Away the Value of Reference Data

By Chris Pickles, Co-Chair of FIX Trading Community’s Reference Data Subgroup and Member of the Bloomberg Open Symbology Team

Reference data is not only a foundation of data management, it is also a revenue earning commodity, particularly for exchanges and issuers of ISINs. MiFIR requires exchanges, multilateral trading facilities, organised trading facilities and systematic internalisers to deliver defined reference data to national regulators for every financial instrument that is admitted to trading on their venue. It doesn’t matter if the instrument ever trades on that venue; if it is admitted to trading, the reference data has to be delivered.

A first surprise about ESMA’s approach to reference data was its decision to mandate the use of ISINs alone for transaction reporting, particularly after ESMA itself made it clear that it understood that ISINs aren’t widely used by the industry for instruments such as derivatives. Also, ISINs are often fee liable in one form or another.

ESMA has now delivered a second surprise by clarifying that it will be making all of the reference data available via its website, not only to national regulators in the European Union, but to the whole world.

The reference data in question generally has ownership rights and/or intellectual property rights attached to it. It is created by issuers, trading venues and domestic numbering agencies, and it is licensed to users and vendors either on its own or within packages of data. ESMA has said MiFIR requires ESMA to publish all of this reference data and that ‘publish’ means ‘to everyone’. But MiFIR does not say that ESMA has to take and give away all of the data for free, which is particularly relevant when it belongs to other parties.

Both MiFID I and MiFID II require investment firms to publish trade data, but allow them to do so on a ‘reasonable commercial basis’. ESMA is not making it clear if, and how, it intends to address this same issue for reference data, in terms of licensing, fee liability, access control, billing and revenue sharing.

Related content

WEBINAR

Upcoming Webinar: Developing operational resilience

Date: 25 March 2021 Time: 10:00am ET / 3:00pm London / 4:00pm CET Duration: 50 minutes Financial institutions’ operational resilience – essentially the ability to prevent, adapt and respond to, and recover and learn from operational disruptions – has come under extreme pressure during the coronavirus pandemic, with last year’s March lockdown creating unprecedented circumstances...

BLOG

Schroders Deploys SteelEye to Improve MiFID II Transaction Reporting

SteelEye continue to build its customer base looking for Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) solutions with the addition of Schroders. The investment manager deployed SteelEye in July 2020 having selected the compliance technology and data analytics firm on the basis of the quality of its technology, regulatory expertise, and willingness to support...

EVENT

RegTech Summit London

Now in its 5th year, the RegTech Summit in London explores how the European financial services industry can leverage technology to drive innovation, cut costs and support regulatory change.

GUIDE

Regulatory Data Handbook 2020/2021 – Eighth Edition

This eighth edition of A-Team Group’s Regulatory Data Handbook is a ‘must-have’ for capital markets participants during this period of unprecedented change. Available free of charge, it profiles every regulation that impacts capital markets data management practices giving you: A detailed overview of each regulation with key dates, data and data management implications, links to...