About a-team Marketing Services
The knowledge platform for the financial technology industry

A-Team Insight Blogs

Giving Away the Value of Reference Data

Subscribe to our newsletter

By Chris Pickles, Co-Chair of FIX Trading Community’s Reference Data Subgroup and Member of the Bloomberg Open Symbology Team

Reference data is not only a foundation of data management, it is also a revenue earning commodity, particularly for exchanges and issuers of ISINs. MiFIR requires exchanges, multilateral trading facilities, organised trading facilities and systematic internalisers to deliver defined reference data to national regulators for every financial instrument that is admitted to trading on their venue. It doesn’t matter if the instrument ever trades on that venue; if it is admitted to trading, the reference data has to be delivered.

A first surprise about ESMA’s approach to reference data was its decision to mandate the use of ISINs alone for transaction reporting, particularly after ESMA itself made it clear that it understood that ISINs aren’t widely used by the industry for instruments such as derivatives. Also, ISINs are often fee liable in one form or another.

ESMA has now delivered a second surprise by clarifying that it will be making all of the reference data available via its website, not only to national regulators in the European Union, but to the whole world.

The reference data in question generally has ownership rights and/or intellectual property rights attached to it. It is created by issuers, trading venues and domestic numbering agencies, and it is licensed to users and vendors either on its own or within packages of data. ESMA has said MiFIR requires ESMA to publish all of this reference data and that ‘publish’ means ‘to everyone’. But MiFIR does not say that ESMA has to take and give away all of the data for free, which is particularly relevant when it belongs to other parties.

Both MiFID I and MiFID II require investment firms to publish trade data, but allow them to do so on a ‘reasonable commercial basis’. ESMA is not making it clear if, and how, it intends to address this same issue for reference data, in terms of licensing, fee liability, access control, billing and revenue sharing.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Related content

WEBINAR

Recorded Webinar: The Data Office at a Crossroads — AI Governance, Organisational Design, and the Evolving Mandate of the CDO

Who owns AI governance in a capital markets firm – and is the Data Office structured to bear that weight? These questions sit at the heart of A-Team Research’s latest findings, presented here for the first time: the combined results of two landmark surveys examining the role of the Data Office in AI governance and...

BLOG

New Bloomberg US BDC Index Offers Insight into Private Credit

Bloomberg has launched a new index that brightens the light that is bringing transparency to often opaque private markets, this time with a focus on one of the sector’s more specialised corners. The New York-based data behemoth’s US BDC Aggregate Eligible Index (Ticker: BDCUSAGG) gives investors a unique view into how bonds issued by the...

EVENT

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology

Buy AND Build: The Future of Capital Markets Technology London examines the latest changes and innovations in trading technology and explores how technology is being deployed to create an edge in sell side and buy side capital markets financial institutions.

GUIDE

AI in Capital Markets Handbook 2026

AI adoption in capital markets has moved into a more disciplined phase. The priority is now controlled deployment: where AI can be used safely, where it can deliver measurable value, and how outputs can be governed, monitored and evidenced. The 2026 edition of the AI in Capital Markets Handbook examines how AI is being applied...